Cacioppo John T, Hawkley Louise C, Berntson Gary G, Ernst John M, Gibbs Amber C, Stickgold Robert, Hobson J Allan
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jul;13(4):384-7. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00469.
Loneliness predicts morbidity and mortality from broad-based causes, but the reasons for this effect remain unclear. Few differences in traditional health behaviors (e.g., smoking, exercise, nutrition) have been found to differentiate lonely and nonlonely individuals. We present evidence that a prototypic restorative behavior--sleep--does make such a differentiation, not through differences in time in bed or in sleep duration, but through differences in efficacy: In the study we report here, lonely individuals evinced poorer sleep efficiency and more time awake after sleep onset than nonlonely individuals. These results, which were observed in controlled laboratory conditions and were found to generalize to the home, suggest that lonely individuals may be less resilient than nonlonely individuals in part because they sleep more poorly. These results also raise the possibility that social factors such as loneliness not only may influence the selection of health behaviors but also may modulate the salubrity of restorative behaviors.
孤独预示着广泛病因导致的发病和死亡,但这种影响的原因尚不清楚。在传统健康行为(如吸烟、运动、营养)方面,很少发现孤独者和非孤独者之间存在差异。我们提供的证据表明,一种典型的恢复性行为——睡眠——确实存在这种差异,不是通过卧床时间或睡眠时间的差异,而是通过效果的差异:在我们在此报告的研究中,孤独者的睡眠效率比非孤独者差,且入睡后清醒时间更长。这些结果在受控实验室条件下观察到,并被发现可推广到家庭环境,这表明孤独者的恢复能力可能比非孤独者弱,部分原因是他们睡眠质量较差。这些结果还提出了一种可能性,即诸如孤独等社会因素不仅可能影响健康行为的选择,还可能调节恢复性行为的有益性。