Pusch Carsten M, Kayademir Tuncay, Prangenberg Kurt, Conard Nicholas J, Czarnetzki Alfred, Blin Nikolaus
Institute of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Department of Molecular Genetics, Tübingen, Germany.
J Appl Genet. 2002;43(3):351-64.
C/G-->T/A nucleotide alterations have been shown to hamper the straightforward interpretation of mitochondrial DNA sequence data derived from ancient tissues. Attempting to characterise this finding with respect to nuclear DNA, we contrasted two established protocols: (i) an enzymatic repair of damaged DNA, thereby translating and closing nicks in the DNA, and (ii) the application of N-phenacylthiazolium bromide, which cleaves glucose-derived protein crosslinks, presumably derived from Maillard reactions. We used medieval human bones that were refractory to standard PCR procedures. Due to negligible presence of short tandem repeat loci and also mitochondrial sequences, the extracted ancient DNA needed a higher copy PCR system to yield amplification products. The chosen PCR target was specific alphoid repetitive DNA with an experimentally determined minimum of 1000 copies per haploid genome. Alphoid repeat segments were generated from both contemporary DNA and DNA extracts of two human skeletons dating from 450-600 AD (omitting uracil N-glycosylase pre-treatment of the extracted samples), and were subsequently cloned and sequenced. The sequences were evaluated for the number and type of nucleotide alterations noted after the different pre-treatments, and were compared to our alphoid consensus sequence generated from modern DNA. Both methods failed to reflect the expected 32% variability among single alphoid repeats (accounting for locus-specific differences and polymerase errors) as well as to display the actual 2.88 ratio of transitions to transversions. Our data obtained from high-copy-number nuclear DNA mirror the phenomenon of sequence deviations observed in mitochondrial DNA extracted from old specimens.
C/G→T/A核苷酸改变已被证明会妨碍对源自古代组织的线粒体DNA序列数据的直接解读。为了从核DNA方面描述这一发现,我们对比了两种既定方案:(i)对受损DNA进行酶修复,从而翻译并封闭DNA中的切口;(ii)应用N-苯甲酰噻唑溴化物,其可切割可能源自美拉德反应的葡萄糖衍生的蛋白质交联物。我们使用了对标准PCR程序具有抗性的中世纪人类骨骼。由于短串联重复序列位点以及线粒体序列的存在可忽略不计,提取的古代DNA需要更高拷贝数的PCR系统才能产生扩增产物。所选的PCR靶标是特定的α卫星重复DNA,经实验测定单倍体基因组中每个至少有1000个拷贝。从当代DNA以及两具公元450 - 600年人类骨骼的DNA提取物中均产生了α卫星重复片段(提取的样品省略尿嘧啶N-糖基化酶预处理),随后进行克隆和测序。对不同预处理后观察到的核苷酸改变的数量和类型进行了序列评估,并与我们从现代DNA生成的α卫星共有序列进行了比较。两种方法均未能反映出单个α卫星重复序列之间预期的32%变异性(考虑到位点特异性差异和聚合酶错误),也未能显示出实际的转换与颠换2.88的比率。我们从高拷贝数核DNA获得的数据反映了从旧标本中提取的线粒体DNA中观察到的序列偏差现象。