Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
作者信息
Harner S R
机构信息
Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA.
出版信息
Georget J Leg Ethics. 1991 Spring;4(4):869-98.
PMID:12186076
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Georget J Leg Ethics. 1991 Spring;4(4):869-98.
2
Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Issues Law Med. 1986 Jan;1(4):293-317.
3
Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Wis L Rev. 1982;1982(6):1173-98.
4
Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision.
Bioeth Bull. 1995 Summer-Fall;4(2):13-7.
5
Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 1989 Sep-Oct;13(5):482-93.
6
The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
J Law Health. 1988;3(2):189-217.
7
Artificial feeding for severely disoriented, elderly patients.
Can Fam Physician. 1989 May;35:1057-62.
8
Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
NY Law Sch Law Rev. 1996;41(1):285-308.
9
Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
Pepperdine Law Rev. 1990;17(2):461-92.
10
The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Suffolk Univ Law Rev. 1977 Spring;11(4):959-73.
Zotero 插件