Horak F, Studnicka M, Gartner C, Veiter A, Tauber E, Urbanek R, Frischer T
University Children's Hospital, vienna, Austria.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2002 Aug;32(8):1155-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.01448.x.
There is growing evidence that the development of allergic sensitization can be influenced by environmental co-factors. Studies showed that growing up on a farm can protect children against allergic sensitization. However, little is known whether this 'farming effect' can only be observed in early lifetime or whether it also plays a role in later childhood.
The aim of our study was to test whether a farming environment is negatively associated with a new occurrence of skin prick test (SPT) positivity in school children. As a secondary outcome we investigated whether children living on a farm lose their allergic sensitization more frequently than other children.
In a longitudinal design, 1150 elementary school children (mean age 7.8 years, SD 0.7) were recruited from nine different areas of Austria in 1994. A questionnaire and an SPT involving seven common aero-allergens were performed at study entry and at follow-up 3 years later.
A total of 844 children, who underwent two SPTs, were included in the analyses; 15.1% of their families reported working on a farm. Adjusting for potential confounders (parental education, number of siblings, sex, family history of allergy), parental farming was inversely related to the prevalence and new occurrence of SPT positivity [no farming 12.2%, part-time farming 6%, full-time farming 2.2% incidence; odds ratio (OR) farming vs. non-farming 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.98]. Furthermore, children living in a farming environment were more likely to lose their SPT positivity during follow-up (no farming 14.6%, part-time farming 50%, full-time farming 60% loss of sensitization; OR farming vs. non-farming 8.06; 95% CI 2.05-31.75). No difference in the pattern of sensitization to specific allergens could be observed between farming and non-farming children.
A farming environment has a strong negative effect on the development of allergic sensitization. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that atopic children living on a farm lose their SPT positivity more frequently than children from non-farming environments.
越来越多的证据表明,环境因素会影响过敏性致敏的发展。研究表明,在农场长大可使儿童免受过敏性致敏。然而,对于这种“农场效应”是仅在儿童早期出现,还是在儿童后期也起作用,我们知之甚少。
本研究旨在检验农场环境是否与学童新出现的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)阳性呈负相关。作为次要结果,我们调查了生活在农场的儿童是否比其他儿童更频繁地消除其过敏性致敏。
采用纵向设计,1994年从奥地利九个不同地区招募了1150名小学生(平均年龄7.8岁,标准差0.7)。在研究开始时和3年后的随访时进行问卷调查和涉及七种常见气传变应原的SPT。
共有844名接受了两次SPT的儿童纳入分析;其中15.1%的家庭报告从事农业工作。在对潜在混杂因素(父母教育程度、兄弟姐妹数量、性别、过敏家族史)进行校正后,父母从事农业与SPT阳性的患病率和新出现情况呈负相关[非农业家庭为12.2%,兼职农业家庭为6%,全职农业家庭为2.2%;农业家庭与非农业家庭的比值比(OR)为0.34,95%置信区间(CI)为0.12 - 0.98]。此外,生活在农业环境中的儿童在随访期间更有可能消除其SPT阳性(非农业家庭为14.6%,兼职农业家庭为50%,全职农业家庭为60%消除致敏;农业家庭与非农业家庭的OR为8.06;95%CI为2.05 - 31.75)。农业家庭和非农业家庭儿童在对特定变应原的致敏模式上没有差异。
农业环境对过敏性致敏的发展有强烈的负面影响。此外,该研究提供的证据表明,生活在农场的特应性儿童比非农业环境中的儿童更频繁地消除其SPT阳性。