Humphrey Linda L, Helfand Mark, Chan Benjamin K S, Woolf Steven H
Oregon Health & Science University and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mailcode BICC, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):347-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00012.
To synthesize new data on breast cancer screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
MEDLINE; the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry; and reference lists of reviews, editorials, and original studies.
Eight randomized, controlled trials of mammography and 2 trials evaluating breast self-examination were included. One hundred fifty-four publications of the results of these trials, as well as selected articles about the test characteristics and harms associated with screening, were examined.
Predefined criteria were used to assess the quality of each study. Meta-analyses using a Bayesian random-effects model were conducted to provide summary relative risk estimates and credible intervals (CrIs) for the effectiveness of screening with mammography in reducing death from breast cancer.
For studies of fair quality or better, the summary relative risk was 0.84 (95% CrI, 0.77 to 0.91) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after approximately 14 years of observation was 1224 (CrI, 665 to 2564). Among women younger than 50 years of age, the summary relative risk associated with mammography was 0.85 (CrI, 0.73 to 0.99) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after 14 years of observation was 1792 (CrI, 764 to 10 540). For clinical breast examination and breast self-examination, evidence from randomized trials is inconclusive.
In the randomized, controlled trials, mammography reduced breast cancer mortality rates among women 40 to 74 years of age. Greater absolute risk reduction was seen among older women. Because these results incorporate several rounds of screening, the actual number of mammograms needed to prevent one death from breast cancer is higher. In addition, each screening has associated risks and costs.
为美国预防服务工作组综合有关乳腺癌筛查的新数据。
MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验注册库以及综述、社论和原始研究的参考文献列表。
纳入了八项乳腺钼靶摄影随机对照试验和两项评估乳房自我检查的试验。对这些试验结果的154篇出版物以及有关检测特征和筛查相关危害的精选文章进行了审查。
使用预定义标准评估每项研究的质量。采用贝叶斯随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以提供乳腺钼靶摄影筛查降低乳腺癌死亡有效性的汇总相对风险估计值和可信区间(CrI)。
对于质量为中等或更高的研究,汇总相对风险为0.84(95%CrI,0.77至0.91),在约14年的观察期后预防一例乳腺癌死亡所需的筛查人数为1224(CrI,665至2564)。在50岁以下的女性中,与乳腺钼靶摄影相关的汇总相对风险为0.85(CrI,0.73至0.99),在14年的观察期后预防一例乳腺癌死亡所需的筛查人数为179(2)(CrI,764至10540)。对于临床乳房检查和乳房自我检查,随机试验的证据尚无定论。
在随机对照试验中,乳腺钼靶摄影降低了40至74岁女性的乳腺癌死亡率。老年女性的绝对风险降低幅度更大。由于这些结果纳入了多轮筛查,预防一例乳腺癌死亡实际所需的乳腺钼靶摄影检查次数更高。此外,每次筛查都有相关的风险和成本。