Suppr超能文献

比较接受福利的被捕者与未接受福利的被捕者之间的药物使用情况。

Comparing drug use between welfare-receiving arrestees and non-welfare-receiving arrestees.

作者信息

Yacoubian George S, Peters Ronald J, Urbach Blake J, Johnson Regina J

机构信息

University of Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Drug Educ. 2002;32(2):139-47. doi: 10.2190/J9P8-2MP4-6CU7-P004.

Abstract

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) symbolized a comprehensive change to the nation's welfare system. Despite several provisions within PRWORA that focus on the use of illegal drugs, few studies have attempted to identify the prevalence of illegal drug use among welfare recipients. Moreover, no scholarly works have compared rates of drug use in welfare-receiving populations to those of non-welfare-receiving populations with an objective measure of drug use. In the current study, urine specimens were collected from 1,572 arrestees interviewed through Houston's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in 1999. Drug positive rates are compared between welfare-receiving arrestees (n = 116), non-welfare receiving arrestees living below the poverty level (n = 539), and non-welfare receiving arrestees living above the poverty level (n = 917). Welfare-receiving arrestees were more likely to be female, older, less educated, and to test positive for opiates and benzodiazepines than the other subgroups. Implications for welfare reform policy are discussed in light of the current findings.

摘要

1996年的《个人责任与工作机会协调法案》(PRWORA)标志着美国福利制度的全面变革。尽管PRWORA中有几项条款关注非法药物的使用,但很少有研究试图确定福利领取者中非法药物使用的流行情况。此外,没有学术著作通过客观的药物使用衡量标准,将接受福利人群的药物使用率与非接受福利人群的药物使用率进行比较。在当前的研究中,从1999年通过休斯顿被捕者药物滥用监测(ADAM)项目接受访谈的1572名被捕者那里收集了尿液样本。对接受福利的被捕者(n = 116)、生活在贫困线以下的非接受福利被捕者(n = 539)和生活在贫困线以上的非接受福利被捕者(n = 917)的药物阳性率进行了比较。与其他亚组相比,接受福利的被捕者更有可能是女性、年龄较大、受教育程度较低,并且鸦片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物检测呈阳性。根据当前的研究结果,讨论了对福利改革政策的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验