Suppr超能文献

结构相似的分子是否具有相似的生物活性?

Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity?

作者信息

Martin Yvonne C, Kofron James L, Traphagen Linda M

机构信息

Global Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064-6100, USA.

出版信息

J Med Chem. 2002 Sep 12;45(19):4350-8. doi: 10.1021/jm020155c.

Abstract

To design diverse combinatorial libraries or to select diverse compounds to augment a screening collection, computational chemists frequently reject compounds that are > or =0.85 similar to one already chosen for the combinatorial library or in the screening set. Using Daylight fingerprints, this report shows that for IC(50) values determined as a follow-up to 115 high-throughput screening assays, there is only a 30% chance that a compound that is > or = 0.85 (Tanimoto) similar to an active is itself active. Although this enrichment is greater than that found with random screening and docking to three-dimensional structures, this low fraction of actives within similar compounds occurs not only because of deficiencies in the Daylight fingerprints and Tanimoto similarity calculations but also because similar compounds do not necessarily interact with the target macromolecule in similar ways. The current study emphasizes the statistical or probabilistic nature of library design and that perfect results cannot be expected.

摘要

为了设计多样的组合文库或选择多样的化合物来扩充筛选集,计算化学家经常会拒绝那些与已选入组合文库或筛选集中的化合物相似度≥0.85的化合物。本报告使用Daylight指纹图谱表明,对于作为115次高通量筛选分析后续测定的半数抑制浓度(IC50)值而言,如果一种化合物与活性化合物的相似度≥0.85(Tanimoto系数),那么它本身具有活性的概率仅为30%。尽管这种富集程度高于随机筛选以及与三维结构对接所发现的富集程度,但相似化合物中活性化合物所占比例较低,这不仅是因为Daylight指纹图谱和Tanimoto相似度计算存在缺陷,还因为相似化合物不一定以相似的方式与目标大分子相互作用。当前的研究强调了文库设计的统计学或概率性质,并且无法预期会得到完美的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验