Goetz Lance L, Brown Gregory S, Priebe Michael M
Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, USA.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2002 Fall;25(3):167-73. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2002.11753618.
To examine interface pressure characteristics for two alternating air cell mattresses used for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in a spinal cord injury population.
Prospective evaluation of Dynamic Flotation System (DFS) mattress and the Pegasus Airwave Mattress. Subjects acted as their own controls.
Veterans Affairs Medical Center Spinal Cord Injury Unit.
Convenience sample of 15 subjects with spinal cord injuries.
Minimum, maximum, and average interface pressures, and interface pressure range were measured by use of a force-sensing array system. The sacrum was chosen as the area of interest. Recordings lasted 9.5-10 minutes. Analyses were performed on 19 subjects in the supine and 45-degree upright positions for both mattresses.
Maximum and average interface pressures and interface pressure ranges were significantly higher, whereas minimum interface pressures were significantly lower on the Pegasus vs the DFS. For either mattress, the 45-degree position resulted in significantly greater interface pressures. There was no consistent correlation found between interface pressures and body mass index.
Interface pressure characteristics of these two mattresses are very different, and neither mattress retains performance in the 45-degree position. Which interface pressure characteristic is most clinically relevant remains undetermined. Avoidance of the 45-degree sitting position is recommended.
研究两种用于预防和治疗脊髓损伤患者压疮的交替充气床垫的界面压力特征。
对动态漂浮系统(DFS)床垫和飞马气波床垫进行前瞻性评估。受试者自身作为对照。
退伍军人事务医疗中心脊髓损伤科。
15名脊髓损伤患者的便利样本。
使用力传感阵列系统测量最小、最大和平均界面压力以及界面压力范围。选择骶骨作为感兴趣的区域。记录持续9.5 - 10分钟。对两种床垫在仰卧位和45度直立位的19名受试者进行分析。
与DFS床垫相比,飞马床垫的最大和平均界面压力以及界面压力范围显著更高,而最小界面压力显著更低。对于任何一种床垫,45度体位导致的界面压力显著更大。未发现界面压力与体重指数之间存在一致的相关性。
这两种床垫的界面压力特征非常不同,且在45度体位下两种床垫的性能均不佳。哪种界面压力特征在临床上最相关仍未确定。建议避免45度坐姿。