Suppr超能文献

对父母来说什么才重要?一项关于父母在其早产儿生死决策方面经历的定性研究。

What matters to the parents? A qualitative study of parents' experiences with life-and-death decisions concerning their premature infants.

作者信息

Brinchmann Berit Støre, Førde Reidun, Nortvedt Per

机构信息

University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2002 Jul;9(4):388-404. doi: 10.1191/0969733002ne523oa.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to generate knowledge about parents' participation in life-and-death decisions concerning their very premature and/or critically ill infants in hospital neonatal units. The question is: what are parents' attitudes towards their involvement in such decision making? A descriptive study design using in-depth interviews was chosen. During the period 1997-2000, 20 qualitative interviews with 35 parents of 26 children were carried out. Ten of the infants died; 16 were alive at the time of the interview. The comparative method (grounded theory) was used to analyse the data. The analysis was carried out continuously and in parallel with data collection. Six categories were revealed by the analysis: indecision and uncertainty (ambivalence); information and communication; participate, but do not decide; seeming to be included; the parents' child; and individual consideration. The findings appear to indicate that parents agree that they should not have the final word in decisions concerning their infants' future life or death. Such a responsibility would put too heavy a burden on parents who lack the medical knowledge and the professional experience needed to make such a decision, and would be likely to lead to them experiencing strong feelings of guilt. The findings show that parents should be well informed and listened to during the whole decision-making process. Their primary concern was how nurses and physicians communicate with parents who are experiencing a crisis, and how this serious information is presented.

摘要

本文旨在获取有关父母参与医院新生儿病房中关于其极低体重和/或重症婴儿生死决策的相关知识。问题在于:父母对于参与此类决策持何种态度?研究采用了深入访谈的描述性研究设计。在1997年至2000年期间,对26名儿童的35位家长进行了20次定性访谈。其中10名婴儿死亡;16名在访谈时仍存活。采用比较法(扎根理论)对数据进行分析。分析工作在数据收集的同时持续进行。分析揭示了六个类别:犹豫不决与不确定(矛盾心理);信息与沟通;参与但不做决策;看似被纳入;父母的孩子;以及个体考量。研究结果似乎表明,父母认同在关乎婴儿未来生死的决策中他们不应拥有最终决定权。这样的责任会给缺乏做出此类决策所需医学知识和专业经验的父母带来过重负担,并且可能导致他们产生强烈的内疚感。研究结果表明,在整个决策过程中应让父母充分知情并倾听他们的意见。他们主要关心的是护士和医生如何与处于危机中的父母沟通,以及如何传达这一严肃信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验