Clapper John P, Bower Gordon H
Humboldt State U.
Stanford U.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Sep;28(5):908-923. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.5.908.
In 3 experiments, the authors provide evidence for a distinct category-invention process in unsupervised (discovery) learning and set forth a method for observing and investigating that process. In the 1st 2 experiments, the sequencing of unlabeled training instances strongly affected participants' ability to discover patterns (categories) across those instances. In the 3rd experiment, providing diagnostic labels helped participants discover categories and improved learning even for instance sequences that were unlearnable in the earlier experiments. These results are incompatible with models that assume that people learn by incrementally tracking correlations between individual features; instead, they suggest that learners in this study used expectation failure as a trigger to invent distinct categories to represent patterns in the stimuli. The results are explained in terms of J. R. Anderson's (1990, 1991) rational model of categorization, and extensions of this analysis for real-world learning are discussed.
在3项实验中,作者为无监督(发现)学习中一个独特的类别发明过程提供了证据,并阐述了一种观察和研究该过程的方法。在前两项实验中,未标记训练实例的排序强烈影响了参与者发现这些实例中模式(类别)的能力。在第三项实验中,提供诊断标签帮助参与者发现类别,甚至对于早期实验中无法学习的实例序列也提高了学习效果。这些结果与假设人们通过逐步跟踪个体特征之间的相关性来学习的模型不相符;相反,它们表明本研究中的学习者使用期望失败作为触发因素来发明不同的类别以表示刺激中的模式。根据J. R. 安德森(1990年、1991年)的分类理性模型对结果进行了解释,并讨论了该分析对现实世界学习的扩展。