Suppr超能文献

将定性研究纳入循证实践。

Integrating qualitative research into evidence based practice.

作者信息

Greenhalgh Trisha

机构信息

University College London, Room 410, Holborn Union Building, Highgate Hill, London N19 5LV, UK.

出版信息

Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2002 Sep;31(3):583-601, ix. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(02)00009-9.

Abstract

This article attempts to provide an overview of qualitative tools and methods using mainly examples from diabetes research. The other articles in this issue of the Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America have demonstrated the enormous contribution made in the past 15 years or so by rigorous quantitative studies of prevalence, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy to clinical decision-making in endocrinology. In the early 21st century, the state of qualitative research into such topics as the illness experience of diabetes; the barriers to effective self care and positive health choices; the design of complex educational interventions; the design of appropriate, acceptable and responsive health services; and the decision-making behavior of health professionals, is such that there remain many more questions than answers. But qualitative research is increasingly recognized as an important, legitimate and expanding dimension of evidence-based health care (18;19). It is highly likely that the major landmark studies in diabetes care over the next decade will build on an exploratory qualitative study or incorporate an explanatory or evaluative dimension based on qualitative methods.

摘要

本文主要通过糖尿病研究的实例,试图对定性工具和方法进行概述。《北美内分泌与代谢临床》本期的其他文章表明,在过去15年左右的时间里,关于患病率、诊断、预后和治疗的严格定量研究对内分泌学临床决策做出了巨大贡献。在21世纪初,对于诸如糖尿病患病经历;有效自我护理和积极健康选择的障碍;复杂教育干预措施的设计;适当、可接受和有响应性的卫生服务的设计;以及卫生专业人员的决策行为等主题的定性研究状况是,问题仍然远多于答案。但定性研究日益被视为循证医疗保健的一个重要、合理且不断扩展的维度(参考文献18;19)。未来十年糖尿病护理领域的主要标志性研究极有可能基于探索性定性研究展开,或纳入基于定性方法的解释性或评估性维度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验