Mohr David C, Goodkin Donald E, Nelson Sarah, Cox Darcy, Weiner Michael
University of California, VAMC, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA.
Psychosom Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;64(5):803-9. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000024238.11538.ec.
Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) report that stress can trigger disease exacerbations. Considerable research has supported a relationship between stress and both clinical exacerbation and the development of new brain lesions. However, these relationships are not always consistent either within patients or across patients, suggesting the presence of moderators. This study examined the hypothesis that coping moderates the subsequent relationship between stress and the development of new brain lesions in MS.
Thirty-six patients (mean age = 44.4; 22 women, 14 men) with relapsing forms of MS were assessed once every 4 weeks for 28-100 weeks. New brain lesions were identified using monthly Gd+ MRI. Stress was measured within 24 hours before MRI using a modified version of the Social Readjustment Rating Scale that assessed Conflict and Disruption in Routine. Coping was measured at baseline using the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems questionnaire, which produces four scales: distraction, instrumental, palliative, and emotional preoccupation. Data were analyzed using mixed effects logistic regression to account for within-subject correlations. Analyses were lagged such that stress assessments predicted new Gd+ MRI brain lesions 8 weeks later.
As reported previously, stress was significantly related to the development of new Gd+ brain lesions 8 weeks later (OR = 1.62, p =.009). Greater use of distraction was found to be a significant moderator of the relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions (OR = 0.69, p =.037) such that greater use of distraction was associated with a decreased relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions. Increased instrumental coping was marginally associated with a decreased relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions (OR = 0.77, p =.081), while increased emotional preoccupation was marginally associated with an increased relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions (OR = 1.46, p =.088). There was no significant moderating effect for palliative coping (p =.27) and no significant main effects for any coping variables and the subsequent development of new Gd+ brain lesions (p values >.21).
These findings provide modest support for the hypothesis that coping can moderate the relationship between stress and the MS disease activity. Several limitations in this study are discussed. While these findings suggest areas of potentially fruitful research, readers are cautioned that these are preliminary results; inferences regarding the clinical importance of these findings are premature.
许多多发性硬化症(MS)患者报告称压力会引发疾病恶化。大量研究支持了压力与临床恶化以及新脑损伤形成之间的关系。然而,这些关系在患者内部或患者之间并不总是一致的,这表明存在调节因素。本研究检验了应对方式会调节MS患者压力与新脑损伤形成之间后续关系的假设。
36例复发型MS患者(平均年龄 = 44.4岁;22名女性,14名男性),在28 - 100周内每4周评估一次。每月通过钆增强磁共振成像(Gd + MRI)识别新的脑损伤。在MRI检查前24小时内,使用改良版社会再适应评定量表测量压力,该量表评估冲突和日常干扰情况。在基线时使用应对健康损伤和问题问卷测量应对方式,该问卷产生四个量表:分心、工具性、姑息性和情绪专注。使用混合效应逻辑回归分析数据,以考虑个体内相关性。分析采用滞后分析,即压力评估预测8周后新的Gd + MRI脑损伤情况。
如先前报道,压力与8周后新的Gd +脑损伤形成显著相关(优势比 = 1.62,p = 0.009)。发现更多地使用分心是压力与新的Gd +损伤之间关系的显著调节因素(优势比 = 0.69,p = 0.037),即更多地使用分心与压力和新的Gd +损伤之间关系的减弱相关。工具性应对增加与压力和新的Gd +损伤之间关系减弱存在边缘关联(优势比 = 0.77,p = = 0.081),而情绪专注增加与压力和新的Gd +损伤之间关系增强存在边缘关联(优势比 = 1.46,p = 0.088)。姑息性应对没有显著调节作用(p = 0.27),任何应对变量与随后新的Gd +脑损伤形成均无显著主效应(p值 > 0.21)。
这些发现为应对方式可调节压力与MS疾病活动之间关系的假设提供了一定支持。讨论了本研究的几个局限性。虽然这些发现提示了潜在有成果的研究领域,但提醒读者这些是初步结果;关于这些发现临床重要性的推断尚不成熟。