Shaw T R, Kumana C R, Kaye C M, Padgham C, Kaspi T, Hamer J
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Dec;2(6):515-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1975.tb00569.x.
Using in vitro techniques it was confirmed that whilst the release of procainamide from the conventional formulation (Pronestyl) was rapid, that from the sustained-release preparation (Cardiorytmin Retard) occurred over a prolonged period. 2 The peak plasma procainamide concentrations after single doses of Cardiorytmin Retard were relatively lower and occurred later than those after single doses of Pronestyl. Furthermore, after reaching a peak, the fall in plasma procainamide concentration was less rapid after the sustained-release preparation. Early urinary recovery of procainamide in patients and in healthy volunteers was greater after Pronestyl than after Cardiorytmin Retard, though overall recovery in urine was similar. These findings indicate that the absorption of the sustained-release preparation is slower, though the overall bioavailabilities of the two preparations are almost the same. 3 These results confirm the feasibility of using a sustained-release procainamide preparation, such as Cardiorytmin Retard, since it would be possible to administer the same amount of drug in fewer daily doses without plasma concentrations becoming ineffective towards the end of each dosing interval.
通过体外技术证实,虽然普鲁卡因胺从传统制剂(Pronestyl)中的释放很快,但从缓释制剂(Cardiorytmin Retard)中的释放则持续较长时间。2单剂量服用Cardiorytmin Retard后,血浆中普鲁卡因胺的峰值浓度相对较低,且出现时间比单剂量服用Pronestyl后更晚。此外,达到峰值后,缓释制剂使血浆中普鲁卡因胺浓度下降的速度较慢。服用Pronestyl后,患者和健康志愿者尿液中早期回收的普鲁卡因胺比服用Cardiorytmin Retard后更多,不过尿液中的总体回收率相似。这些发现表明,缓释制剂的吸收较慢,尽管两种制剂的总体生物利用度几乎相同。3这些结果证实了使用如Cardiorytmin Retard这样的缓释普鲁卡因胺制剂的可行性,因为有可能以较少的每日剂量给予相同量的药物,而不会在每个给药间隔结束时血浆浓度变得无效。