Suppr超能文献

大鼠动脉血管内病变球囊损伤模型的比较

A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries.

作者信息

Gabeler Edward E E, van Hillegersberg Richard, Statius van Eps Randolph G, Sluiter Wim, Gussenhoven Elma J, Mulder Paul, van Urk Hero

机构信息

Dept of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2002 Sep 27;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-2-16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Balloon injury (BI) of the rat carotid artery (CCA) is widely used to study intimal hyperplasia (IH) and decrease in lumen diameter (LD), but CCA's small diameter impedes the evaluation of endovascular therapies. Therefore, we validated BI in the aorta (AA) and iliac artery (CIA) to compare it with CCA.

METHODS

Rats underwent BI or a sham procedure (control). Light microscopic evaluation was performed either directly or at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 16 weeks follow-up. The area of IH and the change in LD (LD at 16 weeks minus LD post BI) were compared.

RESULTS

In the BI-groups the area of IH increased to 0.14 +/- 0.08 mm2 (CCA), 0.14 +/- 0.03 mm2 (CIA) and 0.12 +/- 0.04 mm2 (AA) at 16 weeks (NS). The LD decreased with 0.49 +/- 0.07 mm (CCA), compared to 0.22 +/- 0.07 mm (CIA) and 0.07 +/- 0.10 mm (AA) at 16 weeks (p < 0.05). The constrictive vascular remodelling (CVR = wall circumference loss combined with a decrease in LD) was -0.17 +/- 0.05 mm in CIA but absent in CCA and AA. No IH, no decrease in LD and no CVR was seen in the control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BI resulted in: (1.) a decrease in LD in CCA due to IH, (2.) a decrease in LD in CIA due to IH and CVR, (3.) no change in LD in AA, (4.) Comparable IH development in all arteries, (5.) CCA has no vasa vasorum compared to CIA and AA, (6.) The CIA model combines good access for 2 F endovascular catheters with a decrease in LD due to IH and CVR after BI.

摘要

背景

大鼠颈动脉(CCA)球囊损伤(BI)被广泛用于研究内膜增生(IH)和管腔直径(LD)减小,但CCA直径较小妨碍了血管内治疗的评估。因此,我们在主动脉(AA)和髂动脉(CIA)中验证了BI,以与CCA进行比较。

方法

大鼠接受BI或假手术(对照)。在直接观察或随访1、2、3、4和16周时进行光镜评估。比较IH面积和LD变化(16周时的LD减去BI后的LD)。

结果

在BI组中,16周时IH面积增加至0.14±0.08mm²(CCA)、0.14±0.03mm²(CIA)和0.12±0.04mm²(AA)(无显著性差异)。16周时,CCA的LD减小0.49±0.07mm,而CIA为0.22±0.07mm,AA为0.07±0.10mm(p<0.05)。CIA中收缩性血管重塑(CVR = 壁周径减小合并LD减小)为-0.17±0.05mm,而CCA和AA中未见。对照组未见IH、LD减小和CVR。

结论

BI导致:(1)CCA中由于IH导致LD减小;(2)CIA中由于IH和CVR导致LD减小;(3)AA中LD无变化;(4)所有动脉中IH发展相当;(5)与CIA和AA相比,CCA无血管滋养管;(6)CIA模型结合了2F血管内导管的良好通路以及BI后由于IH和CVR导致的LD减小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1173/130046/69e438570d42/1471-2261-2-16-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验