Suppr超能文献

低热量空肠喂养在急性胰腺炎中优于全胃肠外营养:一项随机对照研究的结果

Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized comparative study.

作者信息

Abou-Assi Souheil, Craig Kimberly, O'Keefe Stephen J D

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23219, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Sep;97(9):2255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05979.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to define the indications for, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of, nutritional support in patients with acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

All admissions during the 12-month period from January through December 2000, were entered into a common management protocol consisting of an initial 48-h fast with i.v. fluids and analgesics. After 48 h, those patients who were improving were restarted on oral feeding (group O). The remaining patients were randomized to receive nasojejunal (group EN) or parenteral feeding (group TPN). The randomization study was continued until 50 patients had been accrued. Outcomes in the three groups were compared with respect to length of hospital stay, duration of feeding, complications, and hospital costs.

RESULTS

A total of 156 admissions were evaluated in the first 12 months. Of these, 87% patients had mild disease, 10% moderate, and 3% severe; 62% were related to alcohol abuse, 18% gallstones, and 8% idiosyncratic drug reactions. Of the patients, 75% improved on 48 h bowel rest and i.v. fluids, and were discharged within 4 days. The remainder were randomized to jejunal elemental (n = 26) or parenteral (n = 27) feeding. Duration of feeding was shorter with EN (6.7 vs 10.8 days, p < 0.05) and nutrition costs were lower, representing an average cost saving of $2362.00 per patient fed. EN was less effective in meeting estimated nutritional requirements (54 vs 88%, p < 0.0001), but metabolic (p < 0.003) and septic complications (p = 0.01) were lower. Subgroup analysis of patients with severe disease showed similar findings.

CONCLUSION

Despite concerns that metabolic expenditure is increased and that food-stimulated pancreatic secretion might exacerbate the disease process, hypocaloric enteral feeding seems to be safer and less expensive than parenteral feeding and bowel rest in patients with acute pancreatitis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在明确急性胰腺炎患者营养支持的适应证,并评估其成本效益。

方法

纳入2000年1月至12月这12个月期间所有入院患者,采用统一管理方案,初始禁食48小时,给予静脉输液和镇痛药。48小时后,病情改善的患者重新开始经口进食(O组)。其余患者随机分为接受鼻空肠喂养(EN组)或肠外营养(TPN组)。随机化研究持续至累计50例患者。比较三组患者的住院时间、喂养持续时间、并发症及住院费用。

结果

前12个月共评估156例入院患者。其中,87%为轻症患者,10%为中症患者,3%为重症患者;62%与酒精滥用有关,18%与胆结石有关,8%与特异质性药物反应有关。75%的患者在48小时肠道休息和静脉输液后病情改善,并在四天内出院。其余患者随机分为空肠要素饮食组(n = 26)或肠外营养组(n = 27)。EN组的喂养持续时间较短(6.7天对10.8天,p < 0.05),营养成本较低,每名接受喂养的患者平均节省成本2362.00美元。EN组在满足估计营养需求方面效果较差(54%对88%,p < 0.0001),但代谢并发症(p < 0.003)和感染性并发症(p = 0.01)较少。重症患者亚组分析显示了类似结果。

结论

尽管有人担心代谢消耗增加以及食物刺激的胰腺分泌可能会加重疾病进程,但在急性胰腺炎患者中,低热量肠内喂养似乎比肠外营养和肠道休息更安全且成本更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验