Macías Nayeli, Calderón de la Barca Ana María, Bolaños Adriana V, Alemán Heliodoro, Esparza Julián, Valencia Mauro E
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Food Nutr Bull. 2002 Sep;23(3 Suppl):99-102.
Thirty four subjects (13 men and 21 women), 24 to 70 years old from northern Mexico, were measured for body density by air displacement plethysmography (ADP) with the BOD-POD, and for total body water by deuterium oxide dilution and infrared spectroscopy (IRS-DOD). Subjects were given a 30 g dose of deuterium oxide. Saliva samples were filtered, sublimated, and deuterium was measured using a Miran 1 FF, IRS. Linear regression of the fat mass (FM) derived from both methods showed that the intercept (0.071) was not different from zero (p = .96) and the slope was 0.96 (p < .0001) demonstrating the techniques to be equivalent. Further, mean FM was 26.7 +/- 12.4 and 25.6 +/- 12.4 kg, for IRS-DOD and ADP techniques, respectively (p = .08). Precision analysis by the model R2 showed that 92.3% of the variability was explained (SEM = 3.4 kg). Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant bias (r = 0.017; p = .93). Mean difference between methods was -1.08 (CI: -2.3 to + 0.13) kg FM.
来自墨西哥北部的34名受试者(13名男性和21名女性),年龄在24至70岁之间,使用BOD-POD通过空气置换体积描记法(ADP)测量身体密度,并通过氧化氘稀释和红外光谱法(IRS-DOD)测量全身水含量。给受试者服用30克氧化氘剂量。唾液样本经过过滤、升华处理,然后使用Miran 1 FF红外光谱仪测量其中的氘含量。对两种方法得出的脂肪量(FM)进行线性回归分析,结果显示截距(0.071)与零无差异(p = 0.96),斜率为0.96(p < 0.0001),表明这两种技术等效。此外,IRS-DOD和ADP技术测得的平均FM分别为26.7±12.4千克和25.6±12.4千克(p = 0.08)。通过R2模型进行的精密度分析表明,92.3%的变异性得到了解释(标准误 = 3.4千克)。Bland-Altman分析显示无显著偏差(r = 0.017;p = 0.93)。两种方法之间的平均差异为-1.08(置信区间:-2.3至+0.13)千克FM。