Sokoll Lori J, Mangold Leslie A, Partin Alan W, Epstein Jonathan I, Bruzek Debra J, Dunn Willard, Mohr Phaedre, Wallerson Gail, Chan Daniel W
Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Urology. 2002 Oct;60(4 Suppl 1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01692-8.
Over time, the parameters commonly used to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer have changed, and there is now little stratification in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations, clinical stages, and biopsy Gleason scores. This prospective study evaluated the utility of complexed PSA (cPSA ) for predicting organ-confined disease in a contemporary series of subjects. The age range of the 420 men was 39 to 72 years (58.2 +/- 6 years). Specimens were collected before radical prostatectomy, and total and free PSA (Hybritech Tandem assays, Beckman Access; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA) and total and cPSA (Bayer Immuno 1; Bayer Corporation, Tarrytown, NY) were measured. Pathologic stage was determined from the prostatectomy specimen. Of the 420 men, 316 (75%) had organ-confined disease, and 104 (25%) had non-organ-confined disease (20.7% had extraprostatic extension, 2.6% had seminal vesicle involvement, and 1.4% had positive lymph nodes). Prebiopsy Gleason score distribution was as follows: organ-confined organ-confined, 6 (87%) and 7 (10%); non-organ-confined, 6 (66%) and 7 (30%). Of patients with organ-confined disease, 75% had clinical stage T1c disease compared with 56% for non-organ-confined disease. Using univariate logistic regression, the following variables predicted organ-confined disease: biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, total PSA, percent free PSA, cPSA, percent cPSA (P <0.05). A multivariate model with biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, and cPSA had a receiver operator characteristic area under the curve of 0.69. Replacing cPSA with total PSA in this model provided similar information. cPSA and total PSA were highly correlated (r = 0.985). In summary, cPSA was equivalent to total PSA in predicting organ-confined disease. Present and future models and nomograms using PSA as an indicator of pathological stage could consider use of cPSA.
随着时间推移,用于预测局限性前列腺癌男性患者病理分期的常用参数发生了变化,目前在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度、临床分期和活检Gleason评分的预处理阶段几乎没有分层。这项前瞻性研究评估了复合PSA(cPSA)在当代一系列受试者中预测器官局限性疾病的效用。420名男性的年龄范围为39至72岁(58.2±6岁)。在根治性前列腺切除术之前收集样本,并测量总PSA和游离PSA(Hybritech串联检测法,贝克曼Access;贝克曼库尔特公司,加利福尼亚州布雷亚)以及总cPSA和cPSA(拜耳免疫1;拜耳公司,纽约州塔里敦)。从前列腺切除标本确定病理分期。在420名男性中,316名(75%)患有器官局限性疾病,104名(25%)患有非器官局限性疾病(20.7%有前列腺外扩展,2.6%有精囊受累,1.4%有淋巴结阳性)。活检前Gleason评分分布如下:器官局限性,6分(87%)和7分(10%);非器官局限性,6分(66%)和7分(30%)。患有器官局限性疾病的患者中,75%为临床分期T1c疾病,而非器官局限性疾病患者为56%。使用单因素逻辑回归分析,以下变量可预测器官局限性疾病:活检Gleason评分、临床分期、总PSA、游离PSA百分比、cPSA、cPSA百分比(P<0.05)。包含活检Gleason评分、临床分期和cPSA的多变量模型的曲线下受试者操作特征面积为0.69。在该模型中用总PSA替代cPSA可提供类似信息。cPSA与总PSA高度相关(r = 0.985)。总之,在预测器官局限性疾病方面,cPSA与总PSA相当。目前及未来将PSA用作病理分期指标的模型和列线图可考虑使用cPSA。