Suppr超能文献

医学研究委员会关于社区老年人评估与管理的试验:目标、设计与干预措施 [国际标准随机对照试验编号23494848]

The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848].

作者信息

Fletcher A E, Jones D A, Bulpitt C J, Tulloch A J

机构信息

Centre for Ageing and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct 25;2(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-2-21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of regular multidimensional assessment of older people remains controversial. The majority of trials have been too small to produce adequate evidence to inform policy. Despite the lack of a firm evidence base, UK primary care practitioners (general practitioners) are required to offer an annual health check to patients aged 75 years and over.

DESIGN

Cluster-randomised factorial trial in primary care comparing a package of assessments (i) universal versus targeted assessment and (ii) management by the primary care team (PC) or a multidisciplinary geriatric assessment team (GM). The unit of randomization is the general practice.

METHODS

Older people aged 75 and over eligible for the over 75s health check and excluding those in nursing homes or terminally ill were invited to participate. All participants receive a brief assessment covering all areas of the over 75s check. In the universal arm all participants also receive a detailed health and social assessment by a study nurse while in the targeted arm only participants with a pre-determined number and range of problems at the brief assessment go on to have the detailed assessment. The study nurse follows a standard protocol based on results and responses in the detailed assessment to make referrals to (i) the randomised management team (PC or GM) (ii) other medical services, health care workers or agencies (iii) emergency referrals to the GP. The main outcomes are mortality, hospital and institutional admissions and quality of life. 106 practices and 33,000 older people have been recruited to the trial.

摘要

背景

对老年人进行定期多维评估的益处仍存在争议。大多数试验规模过小,无法产生足够的证据为政策提供依据。尽管缺乏确凿的证据基础,但英国初级保健从业者(全科医生)仍被要求为75岁及以上的患者提供年度健康检查。

设计

在初级保健中进行的整群随机析因试验,比较一组评估(i)全面评估与针对性评估,以及(ii)由初级保健团队(PC)或多学科老年评估团队(GM)进行管理。随机化单位是全科诊所。

方法

邀请75岁及以上符合75岁以上健康检查条件且排除养老院患者或绝症患者的老年人参与。所有参与者都接受涵盖75岁以上检查所有领域的简短评估。在全面评估组中,所有参与者还会由研究护士进行详细的健康和社会评估,而在针对性评估组中,只有在简短评估中出现预先确定数量和范围问题的参与者才会继续接受详细评估。研究护士根据详细评估中的结果和反应遵循标准方案,将患者转诊至(i)随机管理团队(PC或GM),(ii)其他医疗服务、医护人员或机构,(iii)紧急转诊至全科医生处。主要结局包括死亡率、住院和机构收容情况以及生活质量。该试验已招募了106家诊所和33000名老年人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/134467/6df8d9bd2f8f/1472-6963-2-21-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验