Rotholtz N A, Efron J E, Weiss E G, Nogueras J J, Wexner S D
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL 33331, USA.
Tech Coloproctol. 2002 Sep;6(2):73-6; discussion 76-7. doi: 10.1007/s101510200016.
The diagnosis of significant rectocele is currently made on the basis of cinedefecographic findings. Clinical examination alone will only allow assessment of the presence but not the significance of a rectocele. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine if anal manometric findings can predict the significance of a rectocele. All patients with a diagnosis of constipation and rectocele confirmed on cinedefecography between 1992 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Significant rectocele was defined as the presence of three of the following five parameters: rectocele >4 cm in diameter as measured during the evacuatory phase of cinedefecography, rectal and/or vaginal symptoms present for longer than 12 months, persistence of rectal or vaginal symptoms for at least four weeks, despite increased dietary fiber (up to 35 g/day), need for rectal and/or vaginal digitation or perineal support maneuvers for rectal evacuation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test. A logistic regression model with stepwise selection was used to determine significant prognostic factors. A total of 305 patients (31 men) with rectocele, with a median age of 68 years (range, 12-89) were identified. Of these, 89 (29.2%) had significant rectoceles. There was no difference in the frequency of significant and non-significant rectoceles with respect to gender or age. However, patients with a significant rectocele compared to those with a non-significant rectocele had higher median first sensation volume (45 vs. 30 ml, p=0.0005), median capacity (160 vs. 120 ml, p<0.0001), and median compliance (10 vs. 8 ml H(2)O/mmHg, p=0.05). Calculations based on a logistic regression model determined that with a first sensation of 100 ml, a capacity of 400 ml, and a compliance of 50 ml/mmHg, the probability of a significant rectocele would be 85%. In conclusion, anal manometric findings may be useful in predicting significant rectocele in constipated patients.
目前,重度直肠膨出的诊断是基于排粪造影检查结果做出的。仅靠临床检查只能判断直肠膨出是否存在,而无法评估其严重程度。因此,本研究的目的是确定肛门测压结果能否预测直肠膨出的严重程度。对1992年至1998年间经排粪造影确诊为便秘和直肠膨出的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。重度直肠膨出定义为具备以下五个参数中的三个:在排粪造影排便期测得直肠膨出直径>4 cm;直肠和/或阴道症状持续超过12个月;尽管膳食纤维摄入量增加(高达35 g/天),直肠或阴道症状仍持续至少四周;需要通过直肠和/或阴道指诊或会阴支撑动作来辅助排便。采用Mann-Whitney检验和Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。使用逐步选择的逻辑回归模型来确定显著的预后因素。共确定了305例直肠膨出患者(31例男性),中位年龄为68岁(范围12 - 89岁)。其中,89例(29.2%)为重度直肠膨出。重度和非重度直肠膨出在性别或年龄方面的发生率无差异。然而,与非重度直肠膨出患者相比,重度直肠膨出患者的首次便意容量中位数更高(45 vs. 30 ml,p = 0.0005),容量中位数更高(160 vs. 120 ml,p < 0.0001),顺应性中位数更高(10 vs. 8 ml H₂O/mmHg,p = 0.05)。基于逻辑回归模型的计算确定,当首次便意容量为100 ml、容量为400 ml、顺应性为50 ml/mmHg时,出现重度直肠膨出的概率为85%。总之,肛门测压结果可能有助于预测便秘患者的重度直肠膨出。