Phillips Beth M, Lonigan Christopher J, Driscoll Kimberly, Hooe Eric S
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1270, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Dec;31(4):465-79. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3104_6.
Examined the validity of the tripartite model of anxiety and depression and its internal structure in children. Measures of positive affect/surgency (PA/S) and negative affect/neuroticism (NA/N) and self-report and peer nominations of symptoms of depression and anxiety were completed by 104 children (mean age = 14.9 years, SD = 1.9). Parents completed measures of temperament and anxious and depressive symptoms. Multitrait-multimethod and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) supported a 3-factor model that included separate Child and Parent NA/N factors and a joint PA/S factor. Child and Parent NA/N were related to symptoms of both depression and anxiety, but neither parent nor peer symptom ratings related to Child NA/N. PA/S was primarily related to symptoms of depression. These results support aspects of the tripartite model in children and suggest caution in the use of multimethod assessment of children's temperament and internalizing symptoms.
考察了焦虑和抑郁的三方模型在儿童中的有效性及其内部结构。104名儿童(平均年龄=14.9岁,标准差=1.9)完成了积极情感/冲动性(PA/S)和消极情感/神经质(NA/N)的测量以及抑郁和焦虑症状的自我报告和同伴提名。父母完成了气质以及焦虑和抑郁症状的测量。多特质-多方法和验证性因素分析(CFA)支持了一个三因素模型,该模型包括单独的儿童和父母NA/N因素以及一个联合的PA/S因素。儿童和父母的NA/N与抑郁和焦虑症状均相关,但父母和同伴的症状评分均与儿童NA/N无关。PA/S主要与抑郁症状相关。这些结果支持了儿童三方模型的某些方面,并建议在使用多方法评估儿童气质和内化症状时要谨慎。