Whittle Jeff, Conigliaro Joseph, Good C Bernie, Hanusa Barbara H, Macpherson David S
Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Nov;17(11):867-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.20335.x.
To determine whether the extent of coronary obstructive disease is similar among black and white patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Retrospective chart review.
We used administrative discharge data to identify white and black male patients, 30 years of age or older, who were discharged between October 1, 1989 and September 30, 1995 from 1 of 6 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina (UnA) and who underwent coronary angiography during the admission. We excluded patients if they did not meet standard clinical criteria for AMI or UnA or if they had had prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting.
Physician reviewers classified the degree of coronary obstruction from blinded coronary angiography reports. Obstruction was considered significant if there was at least 50% obstruction of the left main coronary artery, or if there was 70% obstruction in 1 of the 3 major epicardial vessels or their main branches. Of the 628 eligible patients, 300 (48%) had AMI. Among patients with AMI, blacks were more likely than whites to have no significant coronary obstructions (28/145, or 19%, vs 10/155 or 7%, P =.001). Similarly, among patients with UnA, 33% (56/168) of blacks but just 17% (27/160) of whites had no significant stenoses (P =.012). There were no racial differences in severity of coronary disease among veterans with at least 1 significant obstruction. Racial differences in coronary obstructions remained after correcting for coronary disease risk factors and characteristics of the AMI.
Black veterans who present with acute coronary insufficiency are less likely than whites to have significant coronary obstruction. Current understanding of coronary disease does not provide an explanation for these differences.
确定患有急性冠脉综合征的黑人和白人患者的冠状动脉阻塞性疾病程度是否相似。
回顾性病历审查。
我们使用行政出院数据来识别年龄在30岁及以上的白人和黑人男性患者,这些患者在1989年10月1日至1995年9月30日期间从6家退伍军人事务部(VA)医院中的1家出院,主要诊断为急性心肌梗死(AMI)或不稳定型心绞痛(UnA),且在入院期间接受了冠状动脉造影。如果患者不符合AMI或UnA的标准临床标准,或者之前接受过经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术或冠状动脉旁路移植术,则将其排除。
医生审阅者根据盲法冠状动脉造影报告对冠状动脉阻塞程度进行分类。如果左主干冠状动脉至少有50%的阻塞,或者3条主要心外膜血管或其主要分支中的1条有70%的阻塞,则认为阻塞严重。在628名符合条件的患者中,300名(48%)患有AMI。在AMI患者中,黑人比白人更有可能没有明显的冠状动脉阻塞(28/145,即19%,而白人是10/155或7%,P = 0.001)。同样,在UnA患者中,33%(56/168)的黑人但只有17%(27/160)的白人没有明显狭窄(P = 0.012)。在至少有1处严重阻塞的退伍军人中,冠心病严重程度没有种族差异。在校正冠心病危险因素和AMI特征后,冠状动脉阻塞的种族差异仍然存在。
出现急性冠状动脉功能不全的黑人退伍军人比白人患严重冠状动脉阻塞的可能性更小。目前对冠心病的理解无法解释这些差异。