Connolly Declan A J
Human Performance Laboratory, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Nov;16(4):606-10.
Snowshoeing is currently ranked as one of the top 20 participatory sports in the United States, and the number of participants almost tripled, from 440,000 to 1.2 million in 1998. Despite this large increase in participation, no scientific evidence exists to quantify any physiologic response to the activity. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to assess the energy expenditure of snowshoeing at selected low-level speeds and evaluate its acceptability as a form of aerobic conditioning exercise. Ten habitually active subjects (7 men, 3 women, mean age = 24 +/- 3.9 years, mass = 76.6 +/- 14.5 kg, height = 173.7 +/- 9.6 cm) were recruited. Steady state heart rate data were determined from 2 treadmill tests at 4 and 6 mph. Steady state heart rates at 4 mph and 6 mph from treadmill speeds were then reproduced outdoors under 2 snow conditions, packed, and unpacked snow, while caloric expenditure and speed were determined. Expired gases were collected in Douglas bags for both snowshoe and treadmill trials and then analyzed and corrected indoors for the fractional concentrations of carbon dioxide and oxygen. Data analyses indicate that caloric expenditure during snowshoeing may be considerably higher than previously reported. Snowshoeing on packed snow at 2.95 mph elicited a similar heart rate and energy expenditure response as walking on a treadmill at 4 mph or snowshoeing in unpacked snow at 2.04 mph (Vo(2) = 18.18 +/- 0.8 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Snowshoeing on packed snow at 3.97 mph elicited the same heart rate and energy expenditure response as walking on a treadmill at 6 mph or snowshoeing on unpacked snow at 2.87 mph (Vo(2) = 36.72 +/- 0.8 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Furthermore, increasing walking speed on snow by just 1 mph at slow speeds (2 and 3 mph) resulted in approximately twice the energy expenditure. Our data indicate that current estimates of energy expenditure while snowshoeing underestimate by greater than 50%. Apparently the energy expenditure during snowshoeing is much higher than previously considered and varies considerably because of snow terrain. Furthermore, energy expenditure levels similar to walking can be achieved on snowshoes at much slower speeds. This study represents an original investigation into energy expenditure during snowshoeing.
雪鞋健行目前在美国最受欢迎的20项参与性运动中名列前茅,参与者数量几乎增长了两倍,从1998年的44万增至120万。尽管参与人数大幅增加,但尚无科学证据来量化该活动所引发的任何生理反应。因此,本研究的目的是评估在选定的低速度下雪鞋健行的能量消耗,并评估其作为一种有氧调节运动形式的可接受性。招募了10名有运动习惯的受试者(7名男性,3名女性,平均年龄 = 24 ± 3.9岁,体重 = 76.6 ± 14.5千克,身高 = 173.7 ± 9.6厘米)。通过在跑步机上以4英里/小时和6英里/小时的速度进行两次测试来确定稳态心率数据。然后,在两种雪地条件下,压实雪和未压实雪,在户外重现跑步机速度为4英里/小时和6英里/小时时的稳态心率,同时测定热量消耗和速度。在雪鞋健行和跑步机试验中,呼出的气体都收集在道格拉斯袋中,然后在室内进行分析,并针对二氧化碳和氧气的分数浓度进行校正。数据分析表明,雪鞋健行期间的热量消耗可能比先前报道的要高得多。在压实雪上以2.95英里/小时的速度进行雪鞋健行所引发的心率和能量消耗反应,与在跑步机上以4英里/小时的速度行走或以2.04英里/小时的速度在未压实雪上进行雪鞋健行时相似(摄氧量 = 18.18 ± 0.8毫升×千克⁻¹×分钟⁻¹)。在压实雪上以3.97英里/小时的速度进行雪鞋健行所引发的心率和能量消耗反应,与在跑步机上以6英里/小时的速度行走或以2.87英里/小时的速度在未压实雪上进行雪鞋健行时相同(摄氧量 = 36.72 ± 0.8毫升×千克⁻¹×分钟⁻¹)。此外,在低速(2英里/小时和3英里/小时)下雪鞋健行时,速度每增加1英里/小时,能量消耗大约会增加一倍。我们的数据表明,目前对雪鞋健行时能量消耗的估计低估了超过50%。显然,雪鞋健行期间的能量消耗比先前认为的要高得多,并且由于雪地地形的不同而有很大差异。此外,以慢得多的速度进行雪鞋健行也可以达到与步行相似的能量消耗水平。本研究是对雪鞋健行期间能量消耗的原创性调查。