Mick Diane J, Ackerman Michael H
Center for Clinical Research on Aging, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642-8404, USA.
Heart Lung. 2002 Nov-Dec;31(6):393-8. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2002.129444.
Since the early 1980s, there has been discussion about combining the clinical nurse specialist (CNS) and nurse practitioner (NP) roles. Examination of recent nursing literature reveals renewed interest in differentiating, rather than combining, these 2 advanced practice roles. Research has shown that although the 2 roles share similarities, these advanced practice pursuits are more different than alike, both philosophically and practically. Despite curricular attempts at "blending" CNS and NP philosophies of nursing care and their distinctive domains of practice in master's level degree programs, the uniqueness of these roles in actual practice demands a continuation of educational differentiation in preparation. Both roles are important and address varied systems requirements. Each role has been shaped by population needs, education, market, and legal forces that transform with time. The differing ideologies of CNS and NP practice lead to diverse patient and system outcomes and reveal different researchable questions.
自20世纪80年代初以来,人们一直在讨论将临床护理专家(CNS)和执业护士(NP)的角色合并。对近期护理文献的研究表明,人们重新关注区分这两种高级实践角色,而不是将它们合并。研究表明,尽管这两种角色有相似之处,但从理论和实践角度来看,这些高级实践追求的差异大于相似之处。尽管在硕士学位课程中尝试将CNS和NP的护理理念及其独特的实践领域进行“融合”,但这些角色在实际实践中的独特性要求在教育准备方面继续保持差异化。这两种角色都很重要,且满足不同的系统要求。每个角色都受到人群需求、教育、市场和随时间变化的法律力量的影响。CNS和NP实践的不同理念导致不同的患者和系统结果,并揭示了不同的可研究问题。