Poland Warren S
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2002 Summer;50(3):807-26. doi: 10.1177/00030651020500031701.
From its start, psychoanalysis took as its primary goal the gaining of insight, and the analyst's interpretations as its primary technique for achieving that goal. Multiple factors, including the destructive impact of wild analysis and a growing appreciation of noninterpretive analytic functions, have brought those first principles into question. The author posits a conceptual division of the analyst's interpretive functions into declarative interpretations (content) and a procedural interpretive attitude (underlying process). The interpretive attitude is presented as crucial and central to psychoanalytic work, relevant and effective even when matters touching on preverbal issues are addressed.
从一开始,精神分析就将洞察作为其主要目标,并将分析师的解释作为实现该目标的主要技术。包括“野蛮分析”的破坏性影响以及对非解释性分析功能的日益重视在内的多种因素,使这些首要原则受到质疑。作者将分析师的解释功能在概念上划分为陈述性解释(内容)和程序性解释态度(潜在过程)。程序性解释态度被认为对精神分析工作至关重要且核心,即使在处理涉及前语言问题的事项时也具有相关性和有效性。