Randolph Adrienne G, Wypij David, Venkataraman Shekhar T, Hanson James H, Gedeit Rainer G, Meert Kathleen L, Luckett Peter M, Forbes Peter, Lilley Michelle, Thompson John, Cheifetz Ira M, Hibberd Patricia, Wetzel Randall, Cox Peter N, Arnold John H
Children's Hospital, MICU, FA-108, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
JAMA. 2002 Nov 27;288(20):2561-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.20.2561.
Ventilator management protocols shorten the time required to wean adult patients from mechanical ventilation. The efficacy of such weaning protocols among children has not been studied.
To evaluate whether weaning protocols are superior to standard care (no defined protocol) for infants and children with acute illnesses requiring mechanical ventilator support and whether a volume support weaning protocol using continuous automated adjustment of pressure support by the ventilator (ie, VSV) is superior to manual adjustment of pressure support by clinicians (ie, PSV).
Randomized controlled trial conducted in the pediatric intensive care units of 10 children's hospitals across North America from November 1999 through April 2001.
One hundred eighty-two spontaneously breathing children (<18 years old) who had been receiving ventilator support for more than 24 hours and who failed a test for extubation readiness on minimal pressure support.
Patients were randomized to a PSV protocol (n = 62), VSV protocol (n = 60), or no protocol (n = 60).
Duration of weaning time (from randomization to successful extubation); extubation failure (any invasive or noninvasive ventilator support within 48 hours of extubation).
Extubation failure rates were not significantly different for PSV (15%), VSV (24%), and no protocol (17%) (P =.44). Among weaning successes, median duration of weaning was not significantly different for PSV (1.6 days), VSV (1.8 days), and no protocol (2.0 days) (P =.75). Male children more frequently failed extubation (odds ratio, 7.86; 95% confidence interval, 2.36-26.2; P<.001). Increased sedative use in the first 24 hours of weaning predicted extubation failure (P =.04) and, among extubation successes, duration of weaning (P<.001).
In contrast with adult patients, the majority of children are weaned from mechanical ventilator support in 2 days or less. Weaning protocols did not significantly shorten this brief duration of weaning.
通气管理方案可缩短成年患者机械通气撤机所需时间。此类撤机方案在儿童中的疗效尚未得到研究。
评估撤机方案对于需要机械通气支持的急性病婴幼儿及儿童是否优于标准护理(无明确方案),以及使用呼吸机持续自动调整压力支持的容量支持撤机方案(即VSV)是否优于临床医生手动调整压力支持(即PSV)。
1999年11月至2001年4月在北美10家儿童医院的儿科重症监护病房进行的随机对照试验。
182名自主呼吸的儿童(<18岁),他们接受机械通气支持超过24小时,且在最低压力支持下拔管准备测试未通过。
患者被随机分为PSV方案组(n = 62)、VSV方案组(n = 60)或无方案组(n = 60)。
撤机时间(从随机分组至成功拔管);拔管失败(拔管后48小时内任何有创或无创通气支持)。
PSV组(15%)、VSV组(24%)和无方案组(17%)的拔管失败率无显著差异(P = 0.44)。在撤机成功的患者中,PSV组(1.6天)、VSV组(1.8天)和无方案组(2.0天)的撤机中位时间无显著差异(P = 0.75)。男性儿童拔管失败更频繁(优势比,7.86;95%置信区间,2.36 - 26.2;P < 0.001)。撤机第1个24小时内镇静剂使用增加预示拔管失败(P = 0.04),且在拔管成功的患者中预示撤机时间(P < 0.001)。
与成年患者不同,大多数儿童在2天或更短时间内即可从机械通气支持中撤机。撤机方案并未显著缩短这一短暂的撤机时间。