Madden Jeanne M, Soumerai Stephen B, Lieu Tracy A, Mandl Kenneth D, Zhang Fang, Ross-Degnan Dennis
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):2031-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020408.
Concern about harm to newborns from early postpartum discharges led to laws establishing minimum hospital stays in the mid-1990s. We evaluated the effects of an early-discharge protocol (a hospital stay of one postpartum night plus a home visit) in a health maintenance organization (HMO) and a subsequent state law guaranteeing a 48-hour hospital stay.
Using interrupted-time-series analysis and data on 20,366 mother-infant pairs with normal vaginal deliveries, we measured changes in length of stay, newborn examinations on the third or fourth day of life, and office visits, emergency department visits, and hospital readmissions for newborns. We also examined expenditures for hospitalizations and home-based care.
The early-discharge program increased the rate of stays of less than two nights from 29.0 percent to 65.6 percent (P<0.001). The rate declined to 13.7 percent after the state mandate (P<0.001). The rate of newborn examinations on the third or fourth day of life increased from 24.5 percent to 64.4 percent with the program (P<0.001), then dropped to 53.0 percent after the mandate (P<0.001)--changes that primarily reflected changes in the rate of home visits. The rate of nonurgent visits to a health center increased from 33.4 percent to 44.7 percent (P<0.001) after the reduced-stay program was implemented. There were no significant changes in the rate of emergency department visits (quarterly mean, 1.1 percent) or rehospitalizations (quarterly mean, 1.5 percent). Results were similar for a vulnerable subgroup with lower incomes, younger maternal age, a lower level of education, or some combination of these characteristics. Average HMO expenditures on hospital and home-based services decreased by $90 per delivery with the early-discharge program and increased by $100 after the mandate.
Neither policy appears to have affected the health outcomes of newborns. After the mandate, newborns were less likely to be examined as recommended on day 3 or 4. Because of changes in hospital prices, the two policies had minimal effects on HMO expenditures for hospital and home-based services.
对产后早期出院给新生儿带来伤害的担忧促使在20世纪90年代中期制定了规定最短住院天数的法律。我们评估了一项早期出院方案(产后住院一晚加一次家访)在一家健康维护组织(HMO)中的效果,以及随后一项保证48小时住院时间的州法律的效果。
我们采用中断时间序列分析,并利用20366对经阴道正常分娩的母婴数据,测量住院时间、出生后第三天或第四天的新生儿检查、门诊就诊、急诊就诊以及新生儿再次住院情况的变化。我们还研究了住院和家庭护理的费用。
早期出院方案使住院时间少于两晚的比例从29.0%增至65.6%(P<0.001)。在州规定实施后,这一比例降至13.7%(P<0.001)。该方案实施后,出生后第三天或第四天进行新生儿检查的比例从24.5%增至64.4%(P<0.001),在规定实施后降至53.0%(P<0.001)——这些变化主要反映了家访比例的变化。缩短住院时间方案实施后,健康中心非紧急就诊比例从33.4%增至44.7%(P<0.001)。急诊就诊率(季度均值为1.1%)或再次住院率(季度均值为1.5%)没有显著变化。对于收入较低、产妇年龄较小、教育程度较低或具有这些特征某种组合的脆弱亚组,结果类似。早期出院方案实施后,HMO在医院和家庭服务方面的平均每次分娩支出减少了90美元,在规定实施后增加了100美元。
这两项政策似乎均未影响新生儿的健康结局。规定实施后,新生儿在第三天或第四天接受建议检查的可能性降低。由于医院价格的变化,这两项政策对HMO在医院和家庭服务方面的支出影响甚微。