Suppr超能文献

学术医疗中心的患者治疗结果:专科培训项目及院内值班主治外科医生的影响。

Patient outcomes in academic medical centers: influence of fellowship programs and in-house on-call attending surgeon.

作者信息

Arbabi Saman, Jurkovich Gregory J, Rivara Frederick P, Nathens Avery B, Moore Maria, Demarest Gerald B, Maier Ronald V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2003 Jan;138(1):47-51; discussion 51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.1.47.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are very few data on characteristics or policies that improve patient outcomes in academic medical institutions. We were interested in 2 such policies or characteristics that are commonly implemented in academic centers: an in-house on-call attending physician policy and the existence of postgraduate medical education.

HYPOTHESIS

An in-house attending surgeon on-call policy and the presence of trauma and critical care fellowship programs improve outcomes of critically injured patients.

DESIGN

Multicenter cohort study. Two cohorts were analyzed: blunt trauma (n = 601; mortality, 16.0%) and penetrating abdominal trauma (n = 503; mortality, 7.5%).

SETTING

Thirty-one academic level I trauma centers, 10 (32.3%) with in-house on-call policy and 11 (35.5%) with fellowship programs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay.

RESULTS

In-house on-call surgeon policy had no impact on mortality or length of hospital or intensive care unit stay for either the blunt or penetrating trauma cohort. However, the presence of fellowship programs was associated with a significant decrease in blunt trauma mortality (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.8) and a decrease in length of intensive care unit stay (mean difference, 4.7 days; 95% CI, 0.6-8.8 days) and hospital stay (mean difference, 3.2 days; 95% CI, 0.6-5.9 days). There were no significant effects of fellowship programs on penetrating trauma outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

An in-house on-call attending surgeon policy is not associated with improved outcomes. In contrast, presence of a trauma and surgical critical care fellowship program, a potential surrogate marker for an institution that is committed to this specialty interest, is associated with improved outcomes for critically injured patients. An investment in advanced postgraduate medical education has potential benefits in patient care and outcomes.

摘要

背景

关于学术性医疗机构中改善患者治疗效果的特征或政策的数据非常少。我们关注学术中心通常实施的两项此类政策或特征:内部值班主治医师政策以及研究生医学教育的存在。

假设

内部值班外科医生政策以及创伤与重症监护 fellowship 项目的存在可改善重伤患者的治疗效果。

设计

多中心队列研究。分析了两个队列:钝性创伤(n = 601;死亡率 16.0%)和穿透性腹部创伤(n = 503;死亡率 7.5%)。

地点

31 个一级学术创伤中心,10 个(32.3%)有内部值班政策,11 个(35.5%)有 fellowship 项目。

主要观察指标

死亡率、住院时间和重症监护病房住院时间。

结果

内部值班外科医生政策对钝性或穿透性创伤队列的死亡率、住院时间或重症监护病房住院时间均无影响。然而,fellowship 项目的存在与钝性创伤死亡率显著降低相关(比值比,0.4;95%置信区间[CI],0.1 - 0.8),以及重症监护病房住院时间缩短(平均差值,4.7 天;95%CI,0.6 - 8.8 天)和住院时间缩短(平均差值,3.2 天;95%CI,0.6 - 5.9 天)。fellowship 项目对穿透性创伤治疗效果无显著影响。

结论

内部值班主治医师政策与改善治疗效果无关。相比之下,创伤与外科重症监护 fellowship 项目的存在,这是致力于该专业领域的机构的一个潜在替代指标,与重伤患者治疗效果改善相关。对高级研究生医学教育的投入在患者护理和治疗效果方面具有潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验