Kogan Ricardo, Martínez M Angélica, Rubilar Lilian, Payá Ernesto, Quevedo Ilsa, Puppo Homero, Girardi Guido, Castro-Rodriguez José A
Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Exequiel González Cortés Children's Hospital and the Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003 Feb;35(2):91-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10180.
Our objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of azithromycin vs. erythromycin and amoxicillin in the treatment of presumed bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory children, and to evaluate the etiologies of these illnesses. One hundred and ten children, aged 1 month to 14 years, were enrolled between January 1996-January 1999. Children were distributed into two groups according to clinical and radiological patterns: classic or atypical pneumonia. Patients with classic pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive oral amoxicillin 75 mg/kg/day for 7 days, or azithromycin 10 mg/kg/day for 3 days; patients with atypical pneumonia received azithromycin 10 mg/kg/day for 3 days, or erythromycin 50 mg/kg/day for 14 days. Chest X-ray, clinical, and laboratory parameters were obtained on enrollment. Clinic visits were performed on days 3, 7, and 14, and chest X-ray follow-up on days 7 and 14. Microbiological diagnosis of classic pathogens was based on blood and bronchial secretion cultures. The diagnosis of atypical pathogens C. pneumoniae, C. trachomatis, and M. pneumoniae was based on PCR and serologic tests.Forty-seven children met the criteria for classic pneumonia (23 children received azithromycin, and 24 received amoxicillin), and 59 children had atypical pneumonia (33 children were treated with azithromycin, and 26 with erythromycin). Demographic characteristics at enrollment were similar between children with classic pneumonia treated with azithromycin and erythromycin and children treated with azithromycin and erythromycin for atypical pneumonia. However, on day 7, children with classic pneumonia who received azithromycin normalized their chest X-ray more often than those who received amoxicillin (81.0% vs. 60.9%, respectively, P = 0.009). The same was true for children with atypical pneumonia; their chest X-rays had normalized by day 14 (100% in those with azithromycin vs. 81% in those with erythromycin, P = 0.059). Also, children with atypical pneumonia treated with azithromycin had earlier cessation of cough than children treated with erythromycin (3.6 +/- 1.9 vs. 5.5 +/- 3.6 days respectively, P = 0.02). There were only three children with side effects (mild diarrhea, all in the erythromycin group). Etiological agents were identified in 41% of children. In conclusion, azithromycin is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of community-acquired classic and atypical pneumonia in children.
我们的目标是比较阿奇霉素与红霉素及阿莫西林在治疗非卧床儿童疑似细菌性社区获得性肺炎方面的临床疗效,并评估这些疾病的病因。1996年1月至1999年1月期间,纳入了110名年龄在1个月至14岁之间的儿童。根据临床和放射学模式将儿童分为两组:典型或非典型肺炎。典型肺炎患者被随机分配接受口服阿莫西林75mg/kg/天,共7天,或阿奇霉素10mg/kg/天,共3天;非典型肺炎患者接受阿奇霉素10mg/kg/天,共3天,或红霉素50mg/kg/天,共14天。在入组时获取胸部X光、临床和实验室参数。在第3、7和14天进行门诊随访,并在第7和14天进行胸部X光复查。典型病原体的微生物学诊断基于血液和支气管分泌物培养。非典型病原体肺炎衣原体、沙眼衣原体和肺炎支原体的诊断基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)和血清学检测。47名儿童符合典型肺炎标准(23名儿童接受阿奇霉素治疗,24名接受阿莫西林治疗),59名儿童患有非典型肺炎(33名儿童接受阿奇霉素治疗,26名接受红霉素治疗)。接受阿奇霉素和红霉素治疗的典型肺炎儿童与接受阿奇霉素和红霉素治疗的非典型肺炎儿童在入组时的人口统计学特征相似。然而,在第7天,接受阿奇霉素治疗的典型肺炎儿童胸部X光恢复正常的比例高于接受阿莫西林治疗的儿童(分别为81.0%和60.9%,P = 0.009)。非典型肺炎儿童情况相同;到第14天他们的胸部X光已恢复正常(接受阿奇霉素治疗的儿童为100%,接受红霉素治疗的儿童为81%,P = 0.059)。此外,接受阿奇霉素治疗的非典型肺炎儿童咳嗽停止时间早于接受红霉素治疗的儿童(分别为3.6±1.9天和5.5±3.6天,P = 0.02)。仅有3名儿童出现副作用(轻度腹泻,均在红霉素组)。在41%的儿童中确定了病原体。总之,阿奇霉素是治疗儿童社区获得性典型和非典型肺炎的有效治疗选择。