Suppr超能文献

鼻中隔纽扣:症状评分与满意度。

Nasal septum buttons: symptom scores and satisfaction.

作者信息

Luff D A, Kam A, Bruce I A, Willatt D J

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2002 Dec;116(12):1001-4. doi: 10.1258/002221502761698720.

Abstract

Patients with symptomatic septal perforations require treatment, with many surgeons advocating primary treatment with an obturator if conservative measures fail. Twenty nasal Button Outcome Questionnaires were sent to patients who had undergone insertion of a septal button between 1990 and 2000 in our unit. Fourteen questinnaires were returned. This study reveals that despite a reduction in symptom score in nine patients, septal buttons are poorly tolerated by patients with only 45 per cent of obturators ultimately being in situ. In view of these findings, patients are now offered a choice between primary surgical and mechanical closure in our unit.

摘要

有症状的鼻中隔穿孔患者需要治疗,许多外科医生主张,如果保守措施失败,应首选使用闭塞器进行治疗。我们向1990年至2000年间在本单位接受鼻中隔纽扣植入术的患者发送了20份鼻纽扣结果调查问卷。共收回14份问卷。这项研究表明,尽管9名患者的症状评分有所降低,但鼻中隔纽扣的耐受性较差,最终只有45%的闭塞器仍在原位。鉴于这些发现,目前在我们单位,患者可在初次手术闭合和机械闭合之间进行选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验