Donahue Christine P, Jensen Roderick V, Ochiishi Tomoyo, Eisenstein Ingrid, Zhao Mingrui, Shors Tracey, Kosik Kenneth S
Department of Neurology, Center for Neurologic Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Hippocampus. 2002;12(6):821-33. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10058.
Transcriptional profiling (TP) offers a powerful approach to identify genes activated during memory formation and, by inference, the molecular pathways involved. Trace eyeblink conditioning is well suited for the study of regional gene expression because it requires the hippocampus, whereas the highly parallel task, delay conditioning, does not. First, we determined when gene expression was most regulated during trace conditioning. Rats were exposed to 200 trials per day of paired and unpaired stimuli each day for 4 days. Changes in gene expression were most apparent 24 h after exposure to 200 trials. Therefore, we profiled gene expression in the hippocampus 24 h after 200 trials of trace eyeblink conditioning, on multiple arrays using additional animals. Of 1,186 genes on the filter array, seven genes met the statistical criteria and were also validated by real-time polymerase chain reaction. These genes were growth hormone (GH), c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase (c-kit), glutamate receptor, metabotropic 5 (mGluR5), nerve growth factor-beta (NGF-beta), Jun oncogene (c-Jun), transmembrane receptor Unc5H1 (UNC5H1), and transmembrane receptor Unc5H2 (UNC5H2). All these genes, except for GH, were downregulated in response to trace conditioning. GH was upregulated; therefore, we also validated the downregulation of the GH inhibitor, somatostatin (SST), even though it just failed to meet criteria on the arrays. By during situ hybridization, GH was expressed throughout the cell layers of the hippocampus in response to trace conditioning. None of the genes regulated in trace eyeblink conditioning were similarly affected by delay conditioning, a task that does not require the hippocampus. These findings demonstrate that transcriptional profiling can exhibit a repertoire of genes sensitive to the formation of hippocampal-dependent associative memories.
转录谱分析(TP)提供了一种强大的方法来识别记忆形成过程中被激活的基因,并由此推断所涉及的分子途径。痕迹性眨眼条件反射非常适合用于区域基因表达的研究,因为它需要海马体参与,而高度平行任务——延迟性条件反射则不需要。首先,我们确定了在痕迹性条件反射过程中基因表达调控最为明显的时间点。大鼠每天接受200次配对和非配对刺激,持续4天。在接受200次刺激后24小时,基因表达的变化最为明显。因此,我们在另外的动物身上进行多次阵列实验,在痕迹性眨眼条件反射200次试验后24小时对海马体中的基因表达进行了分析。在滤膜阵列上的1186个基因中,有7个基因符合统计标准,并通过实时聚合酶链反应得到了验证。这些基因分别是生长激素(GH)、c-kit受体酪氨酸激酶(c-kit)、代谢型谷氨酸受体5(mGluR5)、神经生长因子-β(NGF-β)、原癌基因Jun(c-Jun)、跨膜受体Unc5H1(UNC5H1)和跨膜受体Unc5H2(UNC5H2)。除了GH之外,所有这些基因在痕迹性条件反射后均下调。GH上调;因此,我们还验证了生长激素抑制剂生长抑素(SST)的下调,尽管它在阵列上刚刚未能达到标准。通过原位杂交,在痕迹性条件反射后,GH在海马体的整个细胞层中表达。在痕迹性眨眼条件反射中受调控的基因,没有一个在不需要海马体参与的延迟性条件反射中受到类似影响。这些发现表明,转录谱分析可以展示出对海马体依赖性联想记忆形成敏感的一系列基因。