Suppr超能文献

挪威简短疼痛量表问卷:在癌症疼痛患者中的翻译与验证

The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: translation and validation in cancer pain patients.

作者信息

Klepstad Pål, Loge Jon Håvard, Borchgrevink Petter C, Mendoza Tito R, Cleeland Charles S, Kaasa Stein

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Nov;24(5):517-25. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00526-2.

Abstract

The European Association of Palliative Care recommends the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire (BPI) as a pain assessment tool in clinical studies. After translation into Norwegian, we administered the BPI to 300 hospitalized cancer patients. Cronbach's alphas were computed to assess reliability, and factor analysis was utilized to ascertain construct validity. The BPI interference and pain severity scales were validated against items on pain intensity and pain influence on daily function in the European Organization for Research and Therapy of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. In total, 235 patients (78%) were able to complete the BPI questionnaire, but 82 (35%) of these questionnaires had one or more missing items. Cronbach's alphas were 0.87 for the pain severity and 0.92 for the interference scales. A factor analysis identified three factors; pain intensity, interference with physical function, and interference with psychological functions/sleep. These three factors explained 82% of the variance. The correlation between BPI pain severity index and the EORTC QLQ-C30 item on pain intensity was 0.70 (P < 0.001). The correlation between BPI interference index and the EORTC QLQ-C30 item on pain influence on daily living was 0.62 (P < 0.001). We conclude that BPI has satisfactory psychometric properties, but is not completed by a significant proportion of patients. Further research is needed to establish pain assessment tools for patients unable to answer a comprehensive pain questionnaire, to establish routines for analysis of missing values, and to investigate if pain interference items also reflect disease-related impairment.

摘要

欧洲姑息治疗协会推荐将简明疼痛问卷(BPI)作为临床研究中的疼痛评估工具。翻译成挪威语后,我们对300名住院癌症患者进行了BPI问卷调查。计算了克朗巴哈系数以评估信度,并采用因子分析来确定结构效度。BPI干扰量表和疼痛严重程度量表通过与欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30问卷中的疼痛强度项目以及疼痛对日常功能的影响项目进行对照来验证。总共235名患者(78%)能够完成BPI问卷,但其中82份问卷(35%)有一项或多项缺失项。疼痛严重程度量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.87,干扰量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.92。因子分析确定了三个因子:疼痛强度、对身体功能的干扰以及对心理功能/睡眠的干扰。这三个因子解释了82%的方差。BPI疼痛严重程度指数与EORTC QLQ-C30问卷中疼痛强度项目的相关性为0.70(P < 0.001)。BPI干扰指数与EORTC QLQ-C30问卷中疼痛对日常生活影响项目的相关性为0.62(P < 0.001)。我们得出结论,BPI具有令人满意的心理测量特性,但相当一部分患者无法完成该问卷。需要进一步研究,为无法回答全面疼痛问卷的患者建立疼痛评估工具,建立缺失值分析的常规方法,并研究疼痛干扰项目是否也反映与疾病相关的损害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验