Suppr超能文献

血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)及其受体(Flt-1和Flk-1)在食管鳞状细胞癌中的表达

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (Flt-1 and Flk-1) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Kato Hiroyuki, Yoshikawa Minako, Miyazaki Tatsuya, Nakajima Masanobu, Fukai Yasuyuki, Masuda Norihiro, Fukuchi Minoru, Manda Ryokuhei, Tsukada Katsuhiko, Kuwano Hiroyuki

机构信息

Department of Surgery I, Gunma University Faculty of Medicine, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6C):3977-84.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To clarify the clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (Flk-1), in esophageal cancers, we evaluated the relationships between the expression of VEGF and its receptors, tumor microvessel density (MVD), clinicopathological factors and prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) specimens were obtained during surgery from 64 previously untreated patients. Expression levels of VEGF and its receptors were determined immunohistochemically, and tumor MVD was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (37.5%) of the tumors showed diffuse VEGF immunoreactivity. VEGF expression was significantly correlated with tumor status (p < 0.05) and poor prognosis (log-rank; p < 0.05). VEGFR-1 immunoreactivity was detected in the cytoplasm of the cancer cells in 27 patients (42.2%). VEGFR-1-positive cancers tended to be associated with poorer nodal status (p = 0.1513), but VEGFR-1 expression did not correlate with prognosis in the univariate survival analysis (p = 0.2964). VEGFR-2 immunoreactivity was detected in the cancer cell cytoplasm in 26 patients (40.6%), but VEGFR-2 expression did not correlate with clinicopathological factors or prognosis. Comparison of the MVD and clinicopathological characteristics revealed significant associations between high MVD and poorer tumor status (p < 0.05), blood vessel invasion (p < 0.05) and poor prognosis (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, MVD was identified as an independent prognostic factor as well as depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis. Although VEGF expression correlated significantly with the MVD (p < 0.05), the correlations between VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 expression and the MVD were not significant. There were, however, significant intercorrelations in expression between VEGF, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2.

CONCLUSION

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may play a role in the control of angiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, although VEGF expression correlates significantly with coexpression of its receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, these receptors do not appear to contribute directly to tumor progression. Nevertheless, VEGF and its receptors represent a logical target for antiangiogenic therapy for esophageal SCC.

摘要

背景

为阐明血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)及其受体VEGFR-1(Flt-1)和VEGFR-2(Flk-1)在食管癌中的临床意义,我们评估了VEGF及其受体的表达、肿瘤微血管密度(MVD)、临床病理因素与预后之间的关系。

材料与方法

从64例未经治疗的患者手术中获取胸段食管鳞状细胞癌(SCC)标本。采用免疫组织化学方法测定VEGF及其受体的表达水平,并评估肿瘤MVD。

结果

24例(37.5%)肿瘤显示弥漫性VEGF免疫反应性。VEGF表达与肿瘤状态显著相关(p < 0.05)且预后较差(对数秩检验;p < 0.05)。27例患者(42.2%)的癌细胞胞质中检测到VEGFR-1免疫反应性。VEGFR-1阳性的癌症往往与较差的淋巴结状态相关(p = 0.1513),但在单因素生存分析中VEGFR-1表达与预后无关(p = 0.2964)。26例患者(40.6%)的癌细胞胞质中检测到VEGFR-2免疫反应性,但VEGFR-2表达与临床病理因素或预后无关。MVD与临床病理特征的比较显示,高MVD与较差的肿瘤状态(p < 0.05)、血管侵犯(p < 0.05)和预后较差(p < 0.01)之间存在显著关联。在多因素分析中,MVD以及肿瘤浸润深度和淋巴结转移被确定为独立的预后因素。虽然VEGF表达与MVD显著相关(p < 0.05),但VEGFR-1和VEGFR-2表达与MVD之间的相关性不显著。然而,VEGF、VEGFR-1和VEGFR-2之间的表达存在显著的相互关联。

结论

血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)可能在食管鳞状细胞癌的血管生成控制中起作用。然而,尽管VEGF表达与其受体VEGFR-1和VEGFR-2的共表达显著相关,但这些受体似乎并未直接促进肿瘤进展。尽管如此,VEGF及其受体仍是食管SCC抗血管生成治疗的合理靶点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验