Meekers F S L, Broos P L O
Department of Trauma, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2002 Dec;68(5):462-70.
For many years, plating has proved to be a reliable method for the fixation of fractures of the humeral shaft. In the early nineties however, intramedullary devices became increasingly popular for fractures of the humeral shaft. This was based on a global tendency towards minimally invasive surgery, and the attractiveness of the relatively simple procedure and potentially lower complication rate of intramedullary nailing, which had proved to be successful in osteosynthesis of the lower limb, However, until now there is no consensus in the literature as to which device is preferable for different indications. We reviewed 161 patients, operatively treated for a fracture of the humeral shaft in our department between 1986 and 1999. Our experience shows in most indications a higher union rate, better functional results and a lower reoperation rate after plate and screw fixation. In addition, even though plating requires a more technically demanding procedure, in experienced hands, it gave rise to fewer iatrogenic fractures, and fewer persisting pain problems. We recommend the use of plate and screws as primary treatment in all operative indications, except for pathological fractures, very obese patients, and open fractures.
多年来,钢板固定已被证明是治疗肱骨干骨折的可靠方法。然而,在九十年代初,髓内固定装置在肱骨干骨折的治疗中越来越受欢迎。这是基于全球范围内对微创手术的趋势,以及髓内钉固定相对简单的手术过程和潜在较低的并发症发生率的吸引力,髓内钉固定已被证明在下肢骨合成中是成功的。然而,迄今为止,文献中对于不同适应症哪种装置更可取尚无共识。我们回顾了1986年至1999年间在我们科室接受手术治疗的161例肱骨干骨折患者。我们的经验表明,在大多数适应症中,钢板螺钉固定后的愈合率更高、功能结果更好且再次手术率更低。此外,尽管钢板固定需要更高的技术要求,但在经验丰富的医生手中,医源性骨折更少,持续疼痛问题也更少。我们建议,除病理性骨折、极度肥胖患者和开放性骨折外,在所有手术适应症中均将钢板螺钉作为主要治疗方法。