Suppr超能文献

根据不同的指鼻试验方案评定的意向性震颤:一项调查

Intention tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test protocols: a survey.

作者信息

Feys Peter G, Davies-Smith Angela, Jones Rosemary, Romberg Anders, Ruutiainen Juhani, Helsen Werner F, Ketelaer Pierre

机构信息

National Multiple Sclerosis Center, Melsbroek, Belgium.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;84(1):79-82. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50068.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the dependence of intention tremor rating scores on different finger-to-nose test (FNT) protocols, varying in arm position and the time the finger has to be kept on the nose, and to examine their relevance to function.

DESIGN

Observational survey. Video recordings were made while patients performed the FNTs and functional tasks such as pouring water.

SETTING

Three European rehabilitation centers in Belgium, Finland, and England.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six multiple sclerosis patients with intention tremor (avg age, 44.1y).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Six examiners rated the degree of intention tremor by using the Fahn Tremor Rating Scale.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability for rating intention tremor during the FNTs was high (kappa=.65-.74). Both the required arm position and time constraints affected the magnitude of intention tremor rating scores (mean rank, 2.27-2.95) and their functional relevance (rho=.70-.84). Intention tremor was scored the highest when the arm was lifted to 90 degrees of abduction at the shoulder and the subject was required to stabilize the finger on the nose. However, its functional relevance was lower compared with a more "functionally" executed FNT.

CONCLUSIONS

The rating of intention tremor during the FNT depends on test instructions. A standardized protocol is needed.

摘要

目的

研究意向性震颤评分在不同指鼻试验(FNT)方案下的依赖性,这些方案在手臂位置以及手指需保持在鼻子上的时间方面存在差异,并检验它们与功能的相关性。

设计

观察性调查。在患者进行指鼻试验和诸如倒水等功能任务时进行视频记录。

地点

比利时、芬兰和英国的三家欧洲康复中心。

参与者

26名患有意向性震颤的多发性硬化症患者(平均年龄44.1岁)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

6名检查者使用法恩震颤评定量表对意向性震颤程度进行评分。

结果

指鼻试验期间评定意向性震颤的检查者间信度较高(kappa值=0.65 - 0.74)。所需的手臂位置和时间限制均影响意向性震颤评分的大小(平均秩次,2.27 - 2.95)及其功能相关性(rho值=0.70 - 0.84)。当手臂外展至肩部90度且要求受试者将手指稳定在鼻子上时,意向性震颤评分最高。然而,与执行更“功能性”的指鼻试验相比,其功能相关性较低。

结论

指鼻试验期间意向性震颤的评分取决于测试指令。需要一个标准化方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验