Evans H L, Raymond D P, Pelletier S J, Crabtree T D, Pruett T L, Sawyer R G
Surgical Infectious Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Building MR4, Room 3150, Lane Road, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2001 Winter;2(4):255-63; discussion 264-5. doi: 10.1089/10962960152813296.
It is well documented that tertiary peritonitis is associated with different microbiological flora and worse outcomes than secondary peritonitis. It is unknown, however, if these differences can be explained simply by the nosocomial nature of tertiary peritonitis and underlying severity of illness.
We reviewed all episodes of intraabdominal infection on the inpatient surgical services at a university hospital over a 46-month period. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to compare 91 episodes of secondary peritonitis that progressed to tertiary peritonitis (recurrent diffuse or localized intraabdominal infection) to all episodes of secondary peritonitis (n = 453) to identify predictors for developing tertiary peritonitis. Logistic regression was also used to identify predictors of mortality among patients with secondary (n = 473) or tertiary peritonitis (n = 129).
Of 602 episodes of intraabdominal infection identified, there were 473 episodes of secondary peritonitis, including 20 patients who died within seven days of diagnosis. A total of 129 episodes of tertiary peritonitis were identified, of which 91 were preceded by a single episode of secondary peritonitis, and 38 were preceded by an episode of secondary peritonitis and at least one prior episode of tertiary peritonitis. Tertiary peritonitis was associated with a high APACHE II score (14.9 +/- 0.7), pancreatic or small bowel source, drainage only at initial intervention, gram-positive and fungal pathogens, and a high mortality rate (19%). Increasing APACHE II score (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.16, p = 0.0009) independently predicted progression from secondary to tertiary peritonitis while increasing age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = 0.01) and appendiceal source (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.68, p = 0.02) predicted non-progression to tertiary peritonitis. Independent predictors of mortality in this population included increasing age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.1, p < 0.001), increasing APACHE II score (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.3, p < 0.001), and four comorbidities: cerebrovascular disease (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.4-13.1, p = 0.01), malignant disease (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.5, p = 0.01), hemodialysis dependency (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-11.2, p = 0.02), and liver disease (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6-15.1, p = 0.03). Tertiary peritonitis was not an independent predictor of mortality.
We were unable to demonstrate, when compared to secondary peritonitis, that tertiary peritonitis is a significant independent predictor of mortality when other variables are taken into account. This suggests that the high mortality associated with tertiary peritonitis is more a function of the patient population in which it occurs than the severity of the pathologic process itself.
有充分文献记载,与继发性腹膜炎相比,三次腹膜炎与不同的微生物菌群相关且预后更差。然而,尚不清楚这些差异是否仅可由三次腹膜炎的医院获得性本质及潜在疾病严重程度来解释。
我们回顾了一所大学医院住院手术科室在46个月期间内所有腹腔内感染发作情况。采用单因素分析和逻辑回归,将91例进展为三次腹膜炎(复发性弥漫性或局限性腹腔内感染)的继发性腹膜炎发作与所有继发性腹膜炎发作(n = 453)进行比较,以确定发生三次腹膜炎的预测因素。逻辑回归还用于确定继发性腹膜炎(n = 473)或三次腹膜炎(n = 129)患者的死亡预测因素。
在602例已确定的腹腔内感染发作中,有473例继发性腹膜炎发作,其中20例在诊断后7天内死亡。共确定了129例三次腹膜炎发作,其中91例之前有一次继发性腹膜炎发作,38例之前有一次继发性腹膜炎发作及至少一次之前的三次腹膜炎发作。三次腹膜炎与高急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分(14.9±0.7)、胰腺或小肠来源、初始干预时仅行引流、革兰氏阳性菌和真菌病原体以及高死亡率(19%)相关。APACHE II评分增加(比值比[OR]1.07,95%置信区间[CI]1.03 - 1.16,p = 0.0009)独立预测继发性腹膜炎进展为三次腹膜炎,而年龄增加(OR 0.98,95% CI 0.97 - 0.99,p = 0.01)和阑尾来源(OR 0.12,95% CI 0.02 - 0.68,p = 0.02)预测不会进展为三次腹膜炎。该人群中死亡的独立预测因素包括年龄增加(OR 1.06,95% CI 1.03 - 1.1,p < 0.001)、APACHE II评分增加(OR 1.18,95% CI 1.11 - 1.3,p < 0.001)以及四种合并症:脑血管疾病(OR 4.3,95% CI 1.4 - 13.1,p = 0.01)、恶性疾病(OR 2.9,95% CI 1.3 - 6.5,p = 0.01)、血液透析依赖(OR 3.8,95% CI 1.3 - 11.2,p = 0.02)和肝脏疾病(OR 4.2,95% CI 1.6 - 15.1,p = 0.03)。三次腹膜炎不是死亡的独立预测因素。
与继发性腹膜炎相比,当考虑其他变量时,我们无法证明三次腹膜炎是死亡的显著独立预测因素。这表明与三次腹膜炎相关的高死亡率更多是其所发生患者群体的一个函数,而非病理过程本身的严重程度。