Koller Arnold
Department of Sports and Circulatory Medicine, University of Innsbruck Medical School, Innsbruck, Austria.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Mar;35(3):444-8. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000053736.51903.0E.
Cardiac troponin I and T are potent tools for risk stratification and clinical decision-making for patients in the appropriate clinical setting of an acute coronary syndrome. Although these findings are relevant to patients with a typical clinical presentation, caution should be exercised in generalizing the results to troponin-positive athletes with a low clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease. This review addresses the clinical relevance of increased troponin levels induced by strenuous exercise. The imprecision and lack of standardization of currently available troponin assays merit caution with the application of these findings. In addition, it may well be that if reparative processes are present and/or the release is not due to irreversible injury that increases in troponins after vigorous exercise are normal and should not be expected to be of pathophysiological significance. Due to this potential for misclassification, the crux of appropriate interpretation of troponin testing is careful consideration of the corresponding clinical scenario. Troponin-positive patients often have complex coronary lesion morphology with intracoronary thrombus and understandably derive particular benefit from platelet glycoprotein GpIIb/IIa inhibitors as well as low molecular weight heparins. Studies on exercise-induced activation of blood coagulation have produced conflicting results. At present, there is no clear evidence that a hemostatic imbalance may trigger acute cardiac events after strenuous exercise. In contrast to troponin-positive patients, it may thus be premature and even dangerous to recommend pharmacologic intervention (low molecular weight heparins) to (troponin-positive) endurance athletes even when exercising during high-altitude exposure.
心肌肌钙蛋白I和T是急性冠状动脉综合征患者在适当临床环境中进行风险分层和临床决策的有力工具。尽管这些发现与典型临床表现的患者相关,但在将结果推广到临床怀疑冠心病可能性低的肌钙蛋白阳性运动员时应谨慎。本综述探讨了剧烈运动引起的肌钙蛋白水平升高的临床相关性。目前可用的肌钙蛋白检测方法的不精确性和缺乏标准化,使得在应用这些发现时需谨慎。此外,如果存在修复过程和/或释放并非由于不可逆损伤,那么剧烈运动后肌钙蛋白升高可能是正常的,不应被认为具有病理生理学意义。由于存在这种错误分类的可能性,肌钙蛋白检测结果合理解释的关键在于仔细考虑相应的临床情况。肌钙蛋白阳性患者通常有复杂的冠状动脉病变形态,伴有冠状动脉内血栓形成,因此可以理解地从血小板糖蛋白GpIIb/IIa抑制剂以及低分子量肝素中获得特别的益处。关于运动诱导的血液凝固激活的研究结果相互矛盾。目前,没有明确证据表明止血失衡可能在剧烈运动后引发急性心脏事件。与肌钙蛋白阳性患者不同,因此即使在高原暴露期间运动时,向(肌钙蛋白阳性的)耐力运动员推荐药物干预(低分子量肝素)可能为时过早甚至危险。