Aure Olav Frode, Nilsen Jens Hoel, Vasseljen Ottar
Larvik Fysioterapi, Norway.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):525-31; discussion 531-2. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049921.04200.A6.
A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.
To compare the effect of manual therapy to exercise therapy in sick-listed patients with chronic low back pain (>8 wks).
The effect of exercise therapy and manual therapy on chronic low back pain with respect to pain, function, and sick leave have been investigated in a number of studies. The results are, however, conflicting.
Patients with chronic low back pain or radicular pain sick-listed for more than 8 weeks and less than 6 months were included. A total of 49 patients were randomized to either manual therapy (n = 27) or to exercise therapy (n = 22). Sixteen treatments were given over the course of 2 months. Pain intensity, functional disability (Oswestry disability index), general health (Dartmouth COOP function charts), and return to work were recorded before, immediately after, at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment period. Spinal range of motion (Schober test) was measured before and immediately after the treatment period only.
Although significant improvements were observed in both groups, the manual therapy group showed significantly larger improvements than the exercise therapy group on all outcome variables throughout the entire experimental period. Immediately after the 2-month treatment period, 67% in the manual therapy and 27% in the exercise therapy group had returned to work (P < 0.01), a relative difference that was maintained throughout the follow-up period.
Improvements were found in both intervention groups, but manual therapy showed significantly greater improvement than exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain. The effects were reflected on all outcome measures, both on short and long-term follow-up.
一项为期1年随访的多中心、随机对照试验。
比较手法治疗与运动疗法对病假超过8周的慢性下腰痛患者的疗效。
多项研究探讨了运动疗法和手法治疗对慢性下腰痛在疼痛、功能和病假方面的影响。然而,结果相互矛盾。
纳入病假超过8周且少于6个月的慢性下腰痛或根性痛患者。共49例患者被随机分为手法治疗组(n = 27)或运动治疗组(n = 22)。在2个月内进行16次治疗。在治疗前、治疗结束后即刻、4周、6个月和12个月记录疼痛强度、功能障碍(Oswestry功能障碍指数)、总体健康状况(达特茅斯合作功能量表)以及重返工作情况。仅在治疗前和治疗结束后即刻测量脊柱活动度(Schober试验)。
尽管两组均观察到显著改善,但在整个实验期间,手法治疗组在所有结局变量上的改善均显著大于运动治疗组。在2个月治疗期结束后即刻,手法治疗组67%的患者和运动治疗组27%的患者已重返工作(P < 0.01),这一相对差异在整个随访期内持续存在。
两个干预组均有改善,但手法治疗在慢性下腰痛患者中显示出比运动治疗显著更大的改善。这种效果在短期和长期随访的所有结局指标上均有体现。