Sallis James F, McKenzie Thomas L, Conway Terry L, Elder John P, Prochaska Judith J, Brown Marianne, Zive Michelle M, Marshall Simon J, Alcaraz John E
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92103, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Apr;24(3):209-17. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00646-3.
Our objective was to evaluate the effects of environmental, policy, and social marketing interventions on physical activity and fat intake of middle school students on campus.
Twenty-four middle schools were randomly assigned to intervention or control conditions. Baseline measures were collected in spring 1997, and interventions were conducted during the 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 school years SETTING/PARTICIPATION: The schools had mean enrollments of 1109, with 44.5% nonwhite students. Over 2 years, physical activity interventions were designed to increase physical activity in physical education classes and throughout the school day. Nutrition interventions were designed to provide and market low-fat foods at all school food sources, including cafeteria breakfasts and lunches, a la carte sources, school stores, and bag lunches. School staff and students were engaged in policy change efforts, but there was no classroom health education.
Primary outcomes were measured by direct observation and existing records.
Randomized regression models (N =24 schools) revealed a significant intervention effect for physical activity for the total group (p <0.009) and boys (p <0.001), but not girls (p <0.40). The intervention was not effective for total fat (p <0.91) or saturated fat (p <0.79). Survey data indicated that the interventions reduced reported body mass index for boys (p <0.05).
Environmental and policy interventions were effective in increasing physical activity at school among boys but not girls. The interventions were not effective in reducing fat intake at school. School environmental and policy interventions have the potential to improve health behavior of the student population, but barriers to full implementation need to be better understood and overcome.
我们的目标是评估环境、政策和社会营销干预措施对校园中学生身体活动和脂肪摄入量的影响。
24所中学被随机分配到干预组或对照组。1997年春季收集了基线数据,并在1997 - 1998学年和1998 - 1999学年进行了干预。
背景/参与情况:这些学校平均有1109名学生,其中44.5%为非白人学生。在两年时间里,身体活动干预旨在增加体育课和全天的身体活动量。营养干预旨在在所有学校食物供应源提供和推广低脂肪食品,包括自助餐厅的早餐和午餐、单点食物供应处、学校商店和袋装午餐。学校工作人员和学生参与了政策变革工作,但没有进行课堂健康教育。
主要结局通过直接观察和现有记录进行测量。
随机回归模型(N = 24所学校)显示,总体(p < 0.009)和男生(p < 0.001)的身体活动有显著干预效果,但女生没有(p < 0.40)。干预对总脂肪(p < 0.91)或饱和脂肪(p < 0.79)无效。调查数据表明,干预降低了男生报告的体重指数(p < 0.05)。
环境和政策干预在增加学校男生的身体活动方面有效,但对女生无效。这些干预在减少学校脂肪摄入量方面无效。学校环境和政策干预有可能改善学生群体的健康行为,但需要更好地理解和克服全面实施的障碍。