Accardo P Agostino, Pensiero Stefano
Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica, Elettronica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Facoltà di Ingegneria, via Valerio 10, I-34100 Trieste, Italy.
J Biomed Inform. 2002 Jun;35(3):151-9. doi: 10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00513-0.
Some automatic methods have been proposed to identify keratoconus from corneal maps; among these methods, neural networks have proved to be useful. However, the identification of the early cases of this ocular disease remains a problem from both a diagnostic and a screening point of view. Another problem is whether a keratoconus screening must be performed taking into account both eyes of the same subject or each eye separately; hitherto, neural networks have only been used in the second alternative. In order to examine the differences of the two screening alternatives in terms of discriminative capability, several combinations of the number of input, hidden and output nodes and of learning rates have been examined in this study. The best results have been achieved by using as input the parameters of both eyes of the same subject and as output the three categories of clinical classification (normal, keratoconus, other alterations) for each subject, a low number of neurons in the hidden layer (lower than 10) and a learning rate of 0.1. In this case a global sensitivity of 94.1% (with a keratoconus sensitivity of 100%) in the test set as well as a global specificity of 97.6% (98.6% for keratoconus alone) have been reached.
已经提出了一些自动方法从角膜地形图中识别圆锥角膜;在这些方法中,神经网络已被证明是有用的。然而,从诊断和筛查的角度来看,这种眼病早期病例的识别仍然是一个问题。另一个问题是圆锥角膜筛查是必须考虑同一受试者的双眼还是分别检查每只眼睛;迄今为止,神经网络仅用于第二种选择。为了研究两种筛查选择在判别能力方面的差异,本研究考察了输入、隐藏和输出节点数量以及学习率的几种组合。通过将同一受试者双眼的参数作为输入,并将每个受试者的临床分类的三类(正常、圆锥角膜、其他改变)作为输出,隐藏层中神经元数量较少(低于10个)且学习率为0.1,取得了最佳结果。在这种情况下,测试集中的全局敏感性达到了94.1%(圆锥角膜敏感性为100%),全局特异性达到了97.6%(仅圆锥角膜为98.6%)。