[Complutense Verbal Learning Test versus Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised].

INTRODUCTION

We present a comparative study (sensitivity and convergent validity) between a new verbal memory test Complutense Verbal Learning Test (TAVEC) and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMSr) in a sample of patients with acquired brain injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with acquired brain injury were included in this study. Twelve patients were reevaluated six months after their inclusion in a cognitive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. All patients were assessed with the WMSr (verbal memory, general memory and long-term memory) and the TAVEC (verbal learning, immediate memory and delayed memory). Results obtained with both scales were compared (chi-square) and correlated (Pearson correlation).

RESULTS

Globally, learning and memory deficits were detected with both scales. Initially 32.1 % of our sample showed general memory deficits, and 44.4 % long-term memory deficits when assessed with WMSr. These percentages were significantly lower compared to the 57.1 %, 75 % and 78.5 % of our sample who showed learning, recent memory and delayed memory difficulties when evaluated with the TAVEC. The results obtained by the 12 patients included in a cognitive rehabilitation program significantly improved. Numerous strong correlations between the TAVEC and the WMSr were found, suggesting a high degree of convergence between the two instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAVEC is a sensitive measure of learning and memory after acquired brain injury. Due to its sensitivity, ecological value and multifactorial structure we recommend this test for the evaluation of learning and memory of these patients.