Diamond Terrence H, Champion Bernard, Clark William A
Department of Endocrinology, Saint George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales, Grey Street, NSW 2217, Sydney, Australia.
Am J Med. 2003 Mar;114(4):257-65. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01524-3.
We sought to determine whether percutaneous vertebroplasty--which involves the injection of cement to stabilize a fractured vertebral body--may be an effective treatment for vertebral fracture.
We enrolled 79 consecutive osteoporotic patients (24 men and 55 women; ages 51 to 93 years) presenting with acute vertebral fractures. Clinical characteristics and bone densitometry were measured at baseline. Pain scores (on a 0 to 25 scale) and levels of function (on a 0 to 20 scale) were recorded on presentation, at 24 hours, at 6 weeks, and 6 to 12 months after therapy.
Fifty-five patients (70%) were treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty and 24 (30%) were treated by conservative therapy alone. They were followed for a mean of 215 days (range, 57 to 399 days). The baseline clinical characteristics, bone densitometry, and fracture data were similar in the two groups. Twenty-four hours after vertebroplasty, there was a 53% reduction in pain scores (from 19 to 9; P = 0.0001) and a 29% improvement in physical functioning (from 14 to 18; P = 0.0001), whereas pain scores and physical functioning remained unchanged at 24 hours in the patients treated conservatively (both P = 0.0001 compared with the changes after percutaneous vertebroplasty). Thirteen patients (24%) treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty were able to cease all analgesia after 24 hours (P = 0.0001 compared with none of the 24 patients treated conservatively). Clinical outcomes at 6 weeks and 6 to 12 months were similar in both groups.
When compared with conservative therapy, percutaneous vertebroplasty results in prompt pain relief and rapid rehabilitation. In experienced hands, it is a safe and effective procedure for treating acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
我们试图确定经皮椎体成形术(即注入骨水泥以稳定骨折椎体)是否可能是治疗椎体骨折的有效方法。
我们纳入了79例连续的患有急性椎体骨折的骨质疏松患者(24名男性和55名女性;年龄51至93岁)。在基线时测量临床特征和骨密度。在就诊时、治疗后24小时、6周以及6至12个月记录疼痛评分(0至25分制)和功能水平(0至20分制)。
55例患者(70%)接受了经皮椎体成形术治疗,24例(30%)仅接受了保守治疗。平均随访215天(范围57至399天)。两组的基线临床特征、骨密度和骨折数据相似。椎体成形术后24小时,疼痛评分降低了53%(从19分降至9分;P = 0.0001),身体功能改善了29%(从14分提高到18分;P = 0.0001),而保守治疗的患者在24小时时疼痛评分和身体功能保持不变(与经皮椎体成形术后的变化相比,P均 = 0.0001)。13例接受经皮椎体成形术治疗的患者(24%)在24小时后能够停用所有镇痛药物(与24例接受保守治疗的患者无一例能停药相比,P = 0.0001)。两组在6周以及6至12个月时的临床结果相似。
与保守治疗相比,经皮椎体成形术能迅速缓解疼痛并实现快速康复。在经验丰富的医生手中,它是治疗急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的一种安全有效的方法。