Schiller Henry J, Steinberg Jay, Halter Jeffrey, McCann Ulysse, DaSilva Monica, Gatto Louis A, Carney Dave, Nieman Gary
Departments of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1126-33. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000059997.90832.29.
Lower and upper inflection points on the quasi-static curve representing a composite of pressure/volume from the whole lung are hypothesized to represent initial alveolar recruitment and overdistension, respectively, and are currently utilized to adjust mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, alveoli have never been directly observed during the generation of a pressure/volume curve to confirm this hypothesis. In this study, we visualized the inflation of individual alveoli during the generation of a pressure/volume curve by direct visualization using in vivo microscopy in a surfactant deactivation model of lung injury in pigs.
Prospective, observational, controlled study.
University research laboratory.
Eight adult pigs.
Pigs were anesthetized and administered mechanical ventilation, underwent a left thoracotomy, and were separated into two groups: control pigs (n = 3) were subjected to surgical intervention, and Tween lavage pigs (n = 5) were subjected to surgical intervention plus surfactant deactivation by Tween lavage (1.5 mL/kg 5% solution of Tween in saline). The microscope was then attached to the lung, and the size of each was alveolus quantified by measuring the alveolar area by computer image analysis. Each alveolus in the microscopic field was assigned to one of three types, based on alveolar mechanics: type I, no visible change in alveolar size during ventilation; type II, alveoli visibly change size during ventilation but do not totally collapse at end expiration; and type III, alveoli visibly change size during tidal ventilation and completely collapse at end expiration. After alveolar classification, the animals were disconnected from the ventilator and attached to a super syringe filled with 100% oxygen. The lung was inflated from 0 to 220 mL in 20-mL increments with a 10-sec pause between increments for airway pressure and alveolar confirmation to stabilize. These data were utilized to generate both quasi-static pressure/volume curves and individual alveolar pressure/area curves.
The normal lung quasi-static pressure/volume curve has a single lower inflection point, whereas the curve after Tween has an inflection point at 8 mm Hg and a second at 24 mm Hg. Normal alveoli in the control group are all type I and do not change size appreciably during generation of the quasi-static pressure/volume curve. Surfactant deactivation causes a heterogenous injury, with all three alveolar types present in the same microscopic field. The inflation pattern of each alveolar type after surfactant deactivation by Tween was notably different. Type I alveoli in either the control or Tween group demonstrated minimal change in alveolar area with lung inflation. Type I alveolar area was significantly (p <.05) larger in the control as compared with the Tween group. In the Tween group, type II alveoli increased significantly in area, with lung inflation from 0 mL (9666 +/- 1340 microm2) to 40 mL (12,935 +/- 1725 microm2) but did not increase further (220 mL, 14,058 +/- 1740 microm2) with lung inflation. Type III alveoli initially recruited with a relatively small area (20 mL lung volume, 798 +/- 797 microm2) and progressively increased in area throughout lung inflation (120 mL, 7302 +/- 1405 microm2; 220 mL, 11,460 +/- 1078 microm2)
The normal lung does not increase in volume by simple isotropic (balloon-like) expansion of alveoli, as evidenced by the horizontal (no change in alveolar area with increases in airway pressure) pressure/area curve. After surfactant deactivation, the alveolar inflation pattern becomes very complex, with each alveolar type (I, II, and III) displaying a distinct pattern. None of the alveolar pressure/area curves directly parallel the quasi-static lung pressure/volume curve. Of the 16, only one type III atelectatic alveolus recruited at the first inflection point and only five recruited concomitant with the second inflation point, suggesting that neither inflection point was due to inflection point was due to massive alveolar recruitment. Thus, the components responsible for the shape of the pressure/volume curve include all of the individual alveolar pressure/area curves, plus changes in alveolar duct and airway size, and the elastic forces in the pulmonary parenchyma and the chest wall.
代表全肺压力/容积综合情况的准静态曲线上的下拐点和上拐点,分别被假定为代表初始肺泡复张和过度扩张,目前被用于调整急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的机械通气。然而,在压力/容积曲线生成过程中,从未直接观察到肺泡情况以证实这一假设。在本研究中,我们在猪肺损伤表面活性剂失活模型中,通过体内显微镜直接观察,在压力/容积曲线生成过程中可视化单个肺泡的充气情况。
前瞻性、观察性、对照研究。
大学研究实验室。
八只成年猪。
猪麻醉后进行机械通气,行左胸廓切开术,并分为两组:对照组猪(n = 3)接受手术干预,吐温灌洗组猪(n = 5)接受手术干预加用吐温灌洗使表面活性剂失活(1.5 mL/kg 5%吐温生理盐水溶液)。然后将显微镜连接到肺上,通过计算机图像分析测量肺泡面积来量化每个肺泡的大小。根据肺泡力学,显微镜视野中的每个肺泡被分为三种类型之一:I型,通气过程中肺泡大小无明显变化;II型,通气过程中肺泡大小明显变化但呼气末不完全塌陷;III型,潮式通气过程中肺泡大小明显变化且呼气末完全塌陷。肺泡分类后,动物与呼吸机断开连接并连接到装满100%氧气的超级注射器上。肺以20 mL的增量从0膨胀至220 mL,每次增量之间暂停10秒以稳定气道压力和确认肺泡情况。这些数据用于生成准静态压力/容积曲线和单个肺泡压力/面积曲线。
正常肺准静态压力/容积曲线有一个单一的下拐点,而吐温处理后的曲线在8 mmHg处有一个拐点,在24 mmHg处有第二个拐点。对照组的正常肺泡均为I型,在准静态压力/容积曲线生成过程中肺泡大小无明显变化。表面活性剂失活导致异质性损伤,同一显微镜视野中存在所有三种肺泡类型。吐温使表面活性剂失活后,每种肺泡类型的充气模式明显不同。对照组或吐温组的I型肺泡随着肺膨胀肺泡面积变化最小。与吐温组相比,对照组I型肺泡面积显著更大(p <.05)。在吐温组中,II型肺泡面积显著增加,肺从0 mL(9666 +/- 1340 平方微米)膨胀至40 mL(12,935 +/- 1725 平方微米),但随着肺进一步膨胀(220 mL,14,058 +/- 1740 平方微米)面积不再增加。III型肺泡最初以相对较小的面积复张(肺容积20 mL,798 +/- 797 平方微米),并在整个肺膨胀过程中面积逐渐增加(120 mL,7302 +/- 1405 平方微米;220 mL,11,460 +/- 1078 平方微米)
正常肺并非通过肺泡简单的各向同性(气球样)扩张来增加容积,这由水平的(气道压力增加时肺泡面积无变化)压力/面积曲线证明。表面活性剂失活后,肺泡充气模式变得非常复杂,每种肺泡类型(I、II和III)呈现出独特的模式。没有一条肺泡压力/面积曲线与准静态肺压力/容积曲线直接平行。在16个肺泡中,只有一个III型肺不张肺泡在第一个拐点处复张,只有五个在第二个充气点处同时复张,这表明两个拐点都不是由于大量肺泡复张所致。因此,负责压力/容积曲线形状的因素包括所有单个肺泡压力/面积曲线,以及肺泡导管和气道大小的变化,还有肺实质和胸壁中的弹力。