Weich Scott, Holt Gemma, Twigg Liz, Jones Kelvyn, Lewis Glyn
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Apr 15;157(8):730-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg035.
It is still not known whether the places that people live affect their mental health. The principal aim of this 1991 study was to quantify simultaneously variance in the prevalence of the most common mental disorders, anxiety and depression, in Britain at the individual, household, and electoral ward levels. Data from a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of 8,979 adults aged 16-74 years living in private households nested within 642 electoral wards in England, Wales, and Scotland were analyzed by using multilevel logistic and linear regression. Common mental disorders were assessed by using the General Health Questionnaire. Less than 1% of the total variance in General Health Questionnaire scores occurred at the ward level. This variance was further reduced and was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for characteristics of persons. By contrast, the proportion of total variance at the household level (14.4%, 95% confidence interval: 11.4, 17.5 in the null model) (p < 0.001) was statistically significant and remained so after adjustment for individual- and household-level exposures. While these findings suggest that future interventions should target persons and households rather than places, further research is first required to establish whether other (particularly smaller) areas lead to similar results.
人们居住的地方是否会影响他们的心理健康,目前仍不清楚。这项1991年研究的主要目的是同时量化英国个体、家庭和选区层面上最常见精神障碍(焦虑和抑郁)患病率的差异。对来自英格兰、威尔士和苏格兰642个选区的私人住户中8979名年龄在16 - 74岁的成年人进行的一项具有全国代表性的横断面调查数据,采用多水平逻辑回归和线性回归进行了分析。使用一般健康问卷评估常见精神障碍。一般健康问卷得分的总方差中,不到1%出现在选区层面。在对个体特征进行调整后,这种方差进一步减小且不再具有统计学意义。相比之下,家庭层面的总方差比例(在空模型中为14.4%,95%置信区间:11.4, 17.5)(p < 0.001)具有统计学意义,并且在对个体和家庭层面的暴露因素进行调整后仍然如此。虽然这些发现表明未来的干预措施应以个人和家庭而非地点为目标,但首先需要进一步研究以确定其他(特别是更小的)区域是否会产生类似结果。