Stanley Melinda A, Beck J Gayle, Novy Diane M, Averill Patricia M, Swann Alan C, Diefenbach Gretchen J, Hopko Derek R
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 77030, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Apr;71(2):309-19. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.2.309.
This study addressed the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), relative to minimal contact control (MCC), in a sample of 85 older adults (age 60 years and over) with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). All participants completed measures of primary outcome (worry and anxiety), coexistent symptoms (depressive symptoms and specific fears), and quality of life. Results of both completer and intent-to-treat analyses revealed significant improvement in worry, anxiety, depression, and quality of life following CBT relative to MCC. Forty-five percent of patients in CBT were classified as responders, relative to 8% in MCC. Most gains for patients in CBT were maintained or enhanced over 1-year follow-up. However, posttreatment scores for patients in CBT failed to indicate return to normative functioning.
本研究探讨了认知行为疗法(CBT)相对于最低限度接触控制(MCC),在85名患有广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的60岁及以上老年人样本中的疗效。所有参与者均完成了主要结局(担忧和焦虑)、共存症状(抑郁症状和特定恐惧)以及生活质量的测量。完成者分析和意向性分析的结果均显示,相对于MCC,CBT后患者在担忧、焦虑、抑郁和生活质量方面有显著改善。CBT组45%的患者被归类为有反应者,而MCC组为8%。CBT组患者的大多数改善在1年随访中得以维持或增强。然而,CBT组患者的治疗后得分并未表明其恢复到正常功能水平。