Hutchinson Douglas T, Horwitz Daniel S, Ha Gregory, Thomas Cameron W, Bachus Kent N
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City 84132, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):831-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00010.
Despite the good results that are usually reported after fixation at the sites of olecranon fractures and osteotomies, problems such as loss of fixation, nonunion, and the need for revision surgery are still encountered. Various types of fixation have been recommended, but few have been evaluated with use of clinically relevant cyclic load testing at appropriate levels of stress. The purpose of the present study was to test multiple olecranon fixation techniques under physiologic cyclic loads.
We studied ten cadaveric elbows with use of cyclic loading that simulated (1) active range of motion and (2) pushing up from a chair. Each specimen underwent fixation of a simulated 50% transverse olecranon fracture with use of intramedullary and cortically fixed tension band constructs (in randomized order) followed by fixation with a 7.3-mm-diameter cancellous screw with and without a tension band. Displacement transducers were placed posteriorly on the tension side and anteriorly near the articular surface.
Both configurations involving the 7.3-mm-diameter cancellous screw provided the most stable fixation-nearly five times better than that provided by the Kirschner-wire techniques. Use of the tension band in conjunction with the intramedullary screw improved the stability of fixation. In none of the constructs did the AO tension band result in compression across the osteotomy gap.
The use of a 7.3-mm screw in conjunction with a tension band provided better fixation of simulated displaced transverse fractures than did the use of Kirschner wires in conjunction with a tension band or the use of a screw only. The AO principle of converting posterior tensile forces to articular compressive forces was not demonstrated in this study. We therefore question the validity of the tension band concept in olecranon fracture fixation and recommend passive rather than active range of motion in the immediate postoperative period to limit fracture distraction.
尽管通常报道在尺骨鹰嘴骨折和截骨部位固定后效果良好,但仍会遇到诸如固定失败、骨不连以及需要翻修手术等问题。已经推荐了多种固定类型,但很少有在适当应力水平下使用临床相关的循环载荷测试进行评估的。本研究的目的是在生理循环载荷下测试多种尺骨鹰嘴固定技术。
我们使用模拟(1)主动活动范围和(2)从椅子上起身推起动作的循环加载来研究10具尸体肘部。每个标本使用髓内和皮质固定张力带结构(随机顺序)对模拟的50%横行尺骨鹰嘴骨折进行固定,随后使用带或不带张力带的7.3毫米直径的松质骨螺钉进行固定。位移传感器放置在张力侧后方和关节面附近前方。
两种涉及7.3毫米直径松质骨螺钉的构型提供了最稳定的固定——几乎比克氏针技术提供的固定稳定近五倍。张力带与髓内螺钉联合使用提高了固定的稳定性。在所有结构中,AO张力带均未导致截骨间隙产生压缩。
与使用克氏针联合张力带或仅使用螺钉相比,使用7.3毫米螺钉联合张力带能更好地固定模拟的移位横行骨折。本研究未证实AO将后向拉力转化为关节压力的原理。因此,我们质疑张力带概念在尺骨鹰嘴骨折固定中的有效性,并建议术后早期进行被动而非主动活动范围练习以限制骨折分离。