Suppr超能文献

体感N250和P300随反应时间变化的改变。

Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time.

作者信息

Kida Tetsuo, Nishihira Yoshiaki, Hatta Arihiro, Wasaka Toshiaki, Nakata Hiroki, Sakamoto Masanori, Nakajima Tsuyoshi

机构信息

Laboratory of Physiology, Tsukuba University School of Physical Education, Tennoudai 1-1-1, Tsukuba-city, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 May;89(3-4):326-30. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0801-y. Epub 2003 Mar 18.

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) and the variation of reaction time (RT). For this purpose, we recorded the ERPs (N250 and P300) in fast- and slow-reaction trials during a somatosensory discrimination task. Strong, standard, and weak target electrical stimuli were randomly delivered to the left median nerve at the wrist with a random interstimulus interval (900-1,100 ms). All the subjects were instructed to respond by pressing a button with their right thumb as fast as possible whenever a target stimulus was presented. We divided all the trials into fast- and slow-RT trials and averaged the data. N250 latency tended to be delayed when the RT was slow, but not significantly. P300 latency was delayed significantly when the RT was slow, but to a much lesser extent than the RT delay, so we concluded that the change of RT was not fully determined by the processes reflected by the somatosensory N250 or P300. Furthermore, the larger and earlier P300 in the fast-RT trials implied that when larger amounts of attentional resources were allocated to a given task, the speed of stimulus evaluation somewhat increased and RT was shortened to a great extent. N250 amplitude did not significantly vary in the two RT clusters. In conclusion, the somatosensory N250 reflects active target detection, which is relatively independent of the modulation of the response speed, whereas the somatosensory P300 could change without manipulation of either the stimulus or the response processing demand.

摘要

我们研究了体感事件相关电位(ERP)与反应时间(RT)变化之间的关系。为此,我们在体感辨别任务的快速和慢速反应试验中记录了ERP(N250和P300)。强、标准和弱目标电刺激以随机的刺激间隔(900 - 1100毫秒)随机施加到手腕处的左正中神经。所有受试者被指示每当出现目标刺激时,用右手拇指尽快按下按钮做出反应。我们将所有试验分为快速和慢速RT试验,并对数据进行平均。当RT较慢时,N250潜伏期往往会延迟,但不显著。当RT较慢时,P300潜伏期显著延迟,但延迟程度远小于RT延迟,因此我们得出结论,RT的变化并非完全由体感N250或P300所反映的过程决定。此外,快速RT试验中更大且更早出现的P300表明,当更多的注意力资源分配给给定任务时,刺激评估速度有所提高,RT在很大程度上缩短。N250波幅在两个RT组中没有显著变化。总之,体感N250反映了主动目标检测,相对独立于反应速度的调节,而体感P300可以在不改变刺激或反应处理需求的情况下发生变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验