Suppr超能文献

一种用于切除伤口的新型液体封闭敷料的评估。

Evaluation of a new liquid occlusive dressing for excisional wounds.

作者信息

Singer Adam J, Nable Maria, Cameau Paul, Singer Daniel D, McClain Steve A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2003 May-Jun;11(3):181-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2003.11306.x.

Abstract

We evaluated a novel octylcyanoacrylate-based liquid occlusive dressing for partial-thickness wounds. One hundred and fifteen standardized wounds were created with an electric dermatome set at a depth of 600 micro on the flanks of three pigs and randomly treated with liquid occlusive dressing, a hydrocolloid dressing, or gauze. In one pig, wounds were swabbed with Staphylococcus aureus. Biopsies were taken after 4, 5, 6, and 21 days. Hemostasis was obtained in all wounds treated with the liquid occlusive. The percent reepithelialization of wounds treated with the liquid occlusive and hydrocolloid dressings were significantly greater at days 4 and 5 than control wounds (78% and 82% vs. 40%, p < 0.001 and 99% and 100% vs. 72%, p < 0.001, respectively). None of the liquid occlusive-treated wounds challenged with bacteria became infected. Foreign body reactions were least common in wounds treated with the liquid occlusive (p < 0.001). Scar depth was less for liquid occlusive- and hydrocolloid-treated wounds than controls (285 micro and 303 micro vs. 490 micro, p < 0.001). We conclude that excisional wounds treated with the liquid occlusive dressing reepithelialize as quickly as hydrocolloid-treated wounds. The liquid occlusive dressing is an effective microbial barrier and hemostatic agent resulting in fewer foreign body reactions than hydrocolloid-treated wounds or controls.

摘要

我们评估了一种新型的基于氰基丙烯酸辛酯的液体封闭敷料用于治疗部分厚度伤口。在三只猪的侧腹使用电动皮刀制造了115个标准化伤口,深度设定为600微米,并随机用液体封闭敷料、水胶体敷料或纱布进行治疗。在其中一只猪身上,伤口用金黄色葡萄球菌擦拭。在第4、5、6和21天进行活检。用液体封闭敷料治疗的所有伤口均实现止血。在第4天和第5天,用液体封闭敷料和水胶体敷料治疗的伤口再上皮化百分比显著高于对照伤口(分别为78%和82%对40%,p<0.001;99%和100%对72%,p<0.001)。没有一个受到细菌挑战的液体封闭敷料治疗的伤口发生感染。在液体封闭敷料治疗的伤口中异物反应最少见(p<0.001)。液体封闭敷料和水胶体敷料治疗的伤口瘢痕深度小于对照伤口(分别为285微米和303微米对490微米,p<0.001)。我们得出结论,用液体封闭敷料治疗的切除伤口再上皮化速度与水胶体敷料治疗的伤口一样快。液体封闭敷料是一种有效的微生物屏障和止血剂,与水胶体敷料治疗的伤口或对照相比,异物反应更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验