Poloński Lech, Gasior Mariusz, Wasilewski Jarosław, Wilczek Krzysztof, Wnek Andrzej, Adamowicz-Czoch Elzbieta, Sikora Jacek, Lekston Andrzej, Zebik Tadeusz, Gierlotka Marek, Wojnar Rafał, Szkodziński Janusz, Kondys Marek, Szyguła-Jurkiewicz Bozena, Wołk Robert, Zembala Marian
Third Department of Cardiology of the Silesian School of Medicine, Zabrze, Poland.
Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):855-61. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(02)94823-4.
In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), the efficacy of thrombolysis is low. Angioplasty after failed thrombolysis (rescue percutaneous coronary angioplasty [PTCA]) has been associated with an increase in the incidence of inhospital complications. It has been proposed that these complications result from the procedure itself. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, inhospital complications, and mortality rate of patients with MI who are treated with primary PTCA and PTCA after initial thrombolysis (rescue or immediate rescue) in an experienced clinical center specializing in percutaneous coronary interventions.
The study group consisted of consecutive patients with MI treated with primary PTCA (n = 195) or PTCA after initial thrombolysis (n = 179). The study was performed in a referral center with a 24-hour catheter-laboratory service. The success rate of the procedure was 90.5% and 88.2% in the PTCA after initial thrombolysis group and primary PTCA group, respectively. The groups did not differ in the frequency of reocclusion, emergency surgical revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting), or stroke. In patients without cardiogenic shock, the inhospital mortality rates were 3.2% and 0.6% in the rescue and immediate rescue group and primary PTCA group, respectively (not significant). In a subgroup of patients with cardiogenic shock, the mortality rate was 36.0% in the initial thrombolysis PTCA group and 30.8% in the primary PTCA group. However, after successful PTCA in this subgroup, the mortality rate dropped to 18% and 10%, respectively.
After initial thrombolysis, PTCA is safe, effective, and likely to restore grade 3 Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow in about 90% of patients. When available, immediate rescue PTCA should be performed in all patients, including patients with cardiogenic shock.
在急性心肌梗死(MI)患者中,溶栓治疗的疗效较低。溶栓失败后进行血管成形术(补救性经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术[PTCA])与住院并发症发生率增加有关。有人提出这些并发症是由手术本身导致的。因此,本研究的目的是在一个专门从事经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的经验丰富的临床中心,比较接受直接PTCA和初始溶栓后(补救或即刻补救)PTCA治疗的MI患者的疗效、住院并发症及死亡率。
研究组由接受直接PTCA(n = 195)或初始溶栓后PTCA(n = 179)治疗的连续性MI患者组成。该研究在一个提供24小时导管室服务的转诊中心进行。初始溶栓后PTCA组和直接PTCA组手术成功率分别为90.5%和88.2%。两组在再闭塞、急诊外科血管重建术(冠状动脉搭桥术)或卒中的发生率方面无差异。在没有心源性休克的患者中,补救组和即刻补救组以及直接PTCA组的住院死亡率分别为3.2%和0.6%(无显著性差异)。在心源性休克患者亚组中,初始溶栓PTCA组死亡率为36.0%,直接PTCA组为30.8%。然而,在该亚组患者PTCA成功后,死亡率分别降至18%和10%。
初始溶栓后,PTCA安全、有效,且在约90%的患者中可能恢复心肌梗死溶栓治疗3级血流。如有条件,应在所有患者中,包括心源性休克患者,进行即刻补救PTCA。