Gordon Adam J, Macpherson David S
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Section of General Medicine, 11th Floor (130-U), UniversityDrive C, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Jun 1;91(11):1299-303. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00317-5.
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the American College of Physicians (ACP) have disseminated guidelines to assess preoperative cardiac risks before noncardiac surgery. The objectives of this study were to determine if these guidelines differ in preoperative recommendations for a group of patients, and whether these recommendations differ from actual provider recommendations. In this retrospective cohort study, patient characteristics and physician recommendations were abstracted from electronic medical records of consecutive patients attending a Veteran Affairs medical preoperative evaluation clinic from January 1 to April 1, 1998. Patient characteristics were used to determine what preoperative cardiac testing should have been ordered if each guideline was followed. Possible recommendations included operation without testing (OWT), noninvasive stress testing (NST), cardiac catheterization (CC), or cancel or delay surgery (OTHER). Recommendations were compared using statistical tests for agreement. Of the 138 patients identified, most underwent moderate-risk surgeries. Recommendations for preoperative testing were discordant between guidelines for 17% of patients (kappa = 0.38). Guidelines never agreed on the need for NST. Extreme differences in recommendations (i.e., one recommends OWT, the other CC) occurred in 9 patients (7%). Physicians ordered NST more often (n = 27) than either guideline. In this subgroup of patients where providers ordered a NST, the 2 guidelines significantly differed (kappa = 0.26). When applied to real patients being evaluated for surgery, ACC/AHA and ACP guidelines significantly differed in recommendations for preoperative cardiac testing. Results have implications for implementation, management, and practitioner adherence to published guidelines.
美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)和美国医师学会(ACP)已发布指南,用于评估非心脏手术前的心脏风险。本研究的目的是确定这些指南针对一组患者的术前建议是否存在差异,以及这些建议是否与实际医疗服务提供者的建议不同。在这项回顾性队列研究中,从1998年1月1日至4月1日在退伍军人事务部医疗术前评估诊所就诊的连续患者的电子病历中提取患者特征和医生建议。利用患者特征来确定如果遵循每条指南应该进行哪些术前心脏检查。可能的建议包括不进行检查直接手术(OWT)、无创应激试验(NST)、心脏导管插入术(CC)或取消或推迟手术(OTHER)。使用一致性统计检验对建议进行比较。在确定的138例患者中,大多数接受的是中度风险手术。17%的患者术前检查建议在指南之间不一致(kappa = 0.38)。指南在NST的必要性上从未达成一致。9例患者(7%)出现了建议的极端差异(即一个指南建议OWT,另一个建议CC)。医生进行NST的频率(n = 27)高于任何一条指南。在医疗服务提供者进行NST的这一亚组患者中,两条指南存在显著差异(kappa = 0.26)。当应用于实际接受手术评估的患者时,ACC/AHA和ACP指南在术前心脏检查建议上存在显著差异。研究结果对指南的实施、管理以及从业者对已发布指南的遵循情况具有启示意义。