Stearns Vered, Beebe Katherine L, Iyengar Malini, Dube Eric
Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, USA.
JAMA. 2003 Jun 4;289(21):2827-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2827.
Standard therapy for hot flashes has been hormone replacement with estradiol or progestational agents, but recent data suggest that antidepressants inhibiting serotonin reuptake may also be effective.
To evaluate a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (paroxetine controlled release [CR]) in treating the vasomotor symptoms displayed by a general cross-section of menopausal women.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study conducted across 17 US sites, including urban, suburban, and rural clinics.
A total of 165 menopausal women aged 18 years or older experiencing at least 2 to 3 daily hot flashes and must have discontinued any hormone replacement therapy for at least 6 weeks. Women were excluded if they had any signs of active cancer or were undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
After a 1-week placebo run-in phase, study participants were randomized to receive placebo or receive 12.5 mg/d or 25.0 mg/d of paroxetine CR (in a 1:1:1 ratio) for 6 weeks.
Mean change from baseline to week 6 in the daily hot flash composite score (frequency x severity).
Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to receive placebo and 51 to receive 12.5 mg/d and 58 to receive 25.0 mg/d of paroxetine CR. The mean reductions in the hot flash frequency composite score from baseline to week 6 were statistically significantly greater for those receiving paroxetine CR than for those receiving placebo. By week 6, the mean daily hot flash frequency went from 7.1 to 3.8 (mean reduction, 3.3) for those in the 12.5-mg/d and from 6.4 to 3.2 (mean reduction, 3.2) for those in the 25-mg/d paroxetine CR groups and from 6.6 to 4.8 (mean reduction, 1.8) for those in the placebo group. Mean placebo-adjusted reduction in hot flash composite scores were -4.7 (95% confidence interval, - 8.1 to -1.3; P =.007) comparing 12.5-mg/d paroxetine CR with placebo; and -3.6 (95% confidence interval, -6.8 to -0.4; P =.03) comparing 25.0-mg/d paroxetine CR with placebo. This corresponded to median reductions of 62.2% for those in the 12.5-mg/d and 64.6% for those in the 25.0-mg/d paroxetine CR groups compared with 37.8% for those in the placebo group.
Paroxetine CR may be an effective and acceptable alternative to hormone replacement and other therapies in treating menopausal hot flash symptoms.
潮热的标准治疗方法一直是使用雌二醇或孕激素进行激素替代治疗,但最近的数据表明,抑制5-羟色胺再摄取的抗抑郁药可能也有效。
评估一种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(帕罗西汀控释剂[CR])对绝经后女性总体样本所表现出的血管舒缩症状的治疗效果。
在美国17个地点开展的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,研究地点包括城市、郊区和农村诊所。
共有165名18岁及以上的绝经后女性,她们每天至少经历2至3次潮热,并且必须已停用任何激素替代疗法至少6周。如果女性有任何活动性癌症迹象或正在接受化疗或放疗,则被排除在外。
在为期1周的安慰剂导入期后,研究参与者被随机分配接受安慰剂,或接受12.5毫克/天或25.0毫克/天的帕罗西汀CR(按1:1:1的比例),为期6周。
从基线到第6周每日潮热综合评分(频率×严重程度)的平均变化。
56名参与者被随机分配接受安慰剂,51名接受12.5毫克/天的帕罗西汀CR以及58名接受25.0毫克/天的帕罗西汀CR。从基线到第6周,接受帕罗西汀CR的患者潮热频率综合评分的平均降低幅度在统计学上显著大于接受安慰剂的患者。到第6周时,12.5毫克/天组患者的平均每日潮热频率从7.1次降至3.8次(平均降低3.3次),25毫克/天帕罗西汀CR组患者从6.4次降至3.2次(平均降低3.2次),而安慰剂组患者从6.6次降至4.8次(平均降低1.8次)。与安慰剂相比,12.5毫克/天帕罗西汀CR组潮热综合评分的平均安慰剂校正降低幅度为-4.7(95%置信区间,-8.1至-1.3;P=0.007);与安慰剂相比,25.0毫克/天帕罗西汀CR组为-3.6(95%置信区间,-6.8至-0.4;P=0.03)。这相当于12.5毫克/天组患者中位数降低62.2%,25.0毫克/天帕罗西汀CR组患者降低64.6%,而安慰剂组患者为37.8%。
在治疗绝经后潮热症状方面,帕罗西汀CR可能是激素替代疗法和其他疗法的一种有效且可接受的替代方法。